(05-08-2011, 11:50 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tungurahua#...c_activityThis is precisely what I mean. We point out 'yellow' alerts, because they merely match our expectations. Then that becomes the correlation, and causation. It's ridiculous science.
Recent volcanic activity
In 1999, after a long period of quiescence, the volcano entered an eruptive phase that continues to this day (as of March 2011). The renewed activity in October 1999 produced major ashfall and led to the temporary evacuation of more than 25,000 inhabitants from Baños and the surrounding area (El Comercio 1999). Activity continued at a medium level until May 2006, when activity increased dramatically, culminating in violent eruptions on 14 July 2006 and 16 August 2006. The 16 August 2006 eruption has been the most violent since activity commenced in 1999. This eruption was accompanied by a 10 km high ash plume which spread over an area of 740 by 180 km (IG-EPN 2006, [4]), depositing ash and tephra to the southwest of the volcano. Several pyroclastic flows were generated that killed seven people, and destroyed a number of hamlets and roads on the eastern and northwestern slopes of the volcano (El Comercio 2006). The seven people who died were a family of five and two scientists.
A further eruption and evacuation occurred on 4 December 2010. Ecuador's National Agency of Risk Control issued a "red alert", later downgraded to orange.[3] The Ecuadorean Institute for Geophysics reported a rapid increase in seismic activity, a number of explosions and an ash cloud reaching 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) in height.[4]
Very similar to what someone's idea of 'disclosure' might be, combined with what would be pointed out to be evidence of such. The self-gratification involved is almost embarrassing. Meanwhile, 'tell us another bedtime story of how it will be, Bob Dean.