Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Is our Sun properly STS?

    Thread: Is our Sun properly STS?


    Raman

    Guest
     
    #4
    05-08-2011, 10:48 PM
    (05-08-2011, 09:08 PM)Confused Wrote: I came across something today as part of a science documentary on the Sun, which rang a bell in terms of the percentages provided in the LOO. Consider this --

    Quote:The sun is definitely huge compared to other objects in the solar system. It is big enough to consume all the planets inside it. It even makes up 99% of the entire mass of the solar system.
    source: http://planet-facts.com/how-big-is-the-sun/

    In other words, during the formation of the solar system, the body of the Sun retained 99% of the energy available around its region, which was being shaped by the force of gravity working upon energies of exploding cosmic elements. The sun absorbed it rather than radiating it, and I understand that is what keeps the system in place. Now consider this from the LOO --

    Quote:55.5 Questioner: You mentioned that this will work when the bidding is properly done. What did you mean by “when the bidding is properly done”?

    Ra: I am Ra. To properly bid is to be properly negative. The percentage of thought and behavior involving service to self must approach 99% in order for a third-density negative entity to be properly configured for such a contest of bidding.

    This could be a case of comparing apples and oranges, but I find the percentage aspect there very interesting. For properly negative, you absorb 99% of the energy of the self for the use of the self. Has the Sun done the same? Or in other words, is our Sun deeply STS?

    PS: I am no science or LOO scholar, and thus could be making a false or inane hypothesis.

    Not in the sense of 3d's free will (choice) as zenmaster provided in that quote. This was facilitated by the sun per se as sub-Logos which appears to supervise up to 3d or yellow ray density. In above densities, 6d's at the end can influence 3d as well as manifested by the concept of higher self just before 7d if I remember well. Note the correlation of 6d also using the sub-Logos sun to express fusion between themselves.

    However, your thoughts bring an interesting point about spiritual mass and end result of the octave though. Since even though at 6d/7d balance is necessary, what does this balance entail and why 3d's have higher self of 6d? And the almost direct connection --at times like fusion of late 6d with the sub-logos the sun? Is it an octave wide balance?

    If I consider the Sun to be beginning and end of the octave for this particular solar system (remember Ra making the "mistake" of confusing "galaxy" with solar system?)

    I say beginning and end because it is through the sun in this solar system that we get the archetypes and the programming of the illusion at least to yellow ray --even though all 7 densities are included in the octave) , makes possible the illusion of densities and allows free will as first distortion down hierarchically form the galactic logos....so the sun per se is "outside the octave" but is the originator (or co-originator as sub-logos) of the illusion...

    if I take this a little further, this property of being the recipient and giving the totality of the spiritual mass to the Creator via the logoi, will depend on the quality/quantity of (-) vs (+) sub-sublogoi once the octave coalesces. What percentage overall (considering up to early 6d) would be STS? Would that influence the basis and biases of the next octave? Considering that "the choice" is the basis for this octave.


    Another point to consider is why it appears that is necessary to have wanderers from other octaves...

    So it is not something that one can dismiss with an isolated quote.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked for this post:1 member thanked for this post
      • Confused
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-08-2011, 09:08 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-08-2011, 09:43 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-08-2011, 10:08 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Raman - 05-08-2011, 10:48 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-08-2011, 11:34 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-08-2011, 10:57 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Raman - 05-08-2011, 11:09 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-08-2011, 11:38 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Raman - 05-09-2011, 12:05 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-09-2011, 12:13 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 12:15 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-08-2011, 11:19 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-08-2011, 11:36 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-08-2011, 11:51 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-09-2011, 12:06 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-09-2011, 12:09 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-09-2011, 12:09 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-09-2011, 12:16 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by native - 05-09-2011, 01:31 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-09-2011, 04:03 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 04:17 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-09-2011, 08:25 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 08:30 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Meerie - 05-09-2011, 08:45 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 08:48 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Meerie - 05-09-2011, 08:50 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-09-2011, 09:54 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 03:49 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 10:21 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-09-2011, 10:34 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-09-2011, 01:19 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-09-2011, 02:05 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Unbound - 05-09-2011, 02:51 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-09-2011, 04:22 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 04:31 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-09-2011, 06:11 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 07:50 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-09-2011, 10:37 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-10-2011, 04:05 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 04:26 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Unbound - 05-10-2011, 05:43 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 05:56 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-10-2011, 06:34 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 06:53 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 07:57 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 08:19 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 08:42 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 08:46 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 08:53 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 08:59 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 09:07 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 09:10 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 09:30 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-10-2011, 12:44 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 07:46 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-10-2011, 09:15 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 09:20 PM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by 3DMonkey - 05-10-2011, 08:34 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 08:45 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-10-2011, 07:28 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 07:39 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 08:43 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by zenmaster - 05-10-2011, 09:00 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 09:04 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Namaste - 05-10-2011, 09:29 AM
    RE: Is our Sun properly STS? - by Confused - 05-10-2011, 10:50 AM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode