A puzzling question of Infinity.

[LsavedSmeD]

From the view of Infinite wouldn't it all be simultaneous? I mean that in the manner of the simultaneous functions of the body. The past must exist so that the future can exist, the present is the fragile center point which is the point of "reflection". It is through the entity experience that the future and past reflect in to the one present.

What stirred the stillness? How about itself? Perhaps it appeared to itself and stirred itself, thus setting the motion for its own journey back to the initial point whereby it self awakened, the experience of "finding the Creator" being the actual playing out of its own instantaneous experience? We have to think of what time and space really are, time is just the moment, ALL measurements are relative, there is no measurement in the Point. We have a moment and movement within that moment. From a question of time, I would ask if time is relative to awareness of movement? Time and space are, afterall, just english words we use to describe a concept. The measurements and pre-conceptions we have are mostly distortions.

Yes, Ra states the "beginning" of creation in a linear manner but really it is of an eternal present or immediate happening simultaneously. But the beginning of this awareness is confusing and I am distorted in my perspective. Infinity must have had to ALWAYS been aware, if this was the case.