Acceptance and Will

[spero]

It's been stated before that intention governs whether an act is sts or sto, but i want people to be aware that this is not always the case. A prime example would be Maldek...

10.1
...
Ra: I am Ra. The peoples of Maldek had a civilization somewhat similar to that of the societal complex known to you as Atlantis in that it gained much technological information and used it without care for the preservation of their sphere following to a majority extent the complex of thought, ideas, and actions which you may associate with your so-called negative polarity or the service to self. This was, however, for the most part, couched in a sincere belief/thought structure which seemed to the perception of the mind/body complexes of this sphere to be positive and of service to others. The devastation that wracked their biosphere and caused its disintegration resulted from what you call war.
....
After this experience of learn/teaching, the group decision was to place upon itself a type of what you may call karma alleviation. For this purpose they came into incarnation within your planetary sphere in what were not acceptable human forms. This then they have been experiencing until the distortions of destruction are replaced by distortions towards the desire for a less distorted vision of service to others. Since this was the conscious decision of the great majority of those beings in the Maldek experience, the transition to this planet began approximately 500,000 of your years ago and the type of body complex available at that time was used.

You can see from this example that an entire planetary population sincerely believed their actions were sto and yet they were indulging in thoughts, ideas and actions that were sts. No amount of intention is gonna fix that and as a result they were misguided enough to destroy their planet, spend millenia in a knot of fear and then underwent karmic alleviation until they replaced their distorted vision of sto with one that was less destructive/distorted.

It seems to me that you can't use the tools of the opposite polarity and say you are still operating within the framework of your own. Instead you acknowledge that you will probably have lost some polarity as a result of being defensive or abridging free will but this was something your were willing to pay the cost for and will likely recoup on at a latter date.

Its why i laughed out loud at 3D's response

If you wanna know what I'd do.... I'd probably go 'STS all up on that mfer', but I'm not going to say I did it for love. No, that would be delusional.

One more thing i've noticed might also be a stumbling block is whether performing an act which results in loss of positive polarity is the same as performing a sts act. Technically it could be considered the same but i personally wouldn't. Polarity is the currency of the densities above our own. If you have enough positive polarity you might be willing to lose a little for the sake of something greater.

Even Ra makes these concessions to loss of polarity (though some would argue they don't have polarity...) and i would hesistate to equate their minor loss of polarity with a sts act.

53.3
...
Ra: I am Ra. This query is marginal. We will make the concession towards information with some loss of polarity due to free will being abridged. We request that questions of this nature be kept to a minimum....