04-25-2011, 08:52 PM
(04-25-2011, 08:38 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: No. I am saying that to reach the other self, self must accept the desire of other self to make the choice to offer.
I've already agreed with that. I was making a distinction between accepting the other self's choice, vs. accepting their choice of service to the degree that it affects us.
(04-25-2011, 08:38 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: There is no love if one does not accept the will of the other.
When the will of the other imposes on an other self's will, it changes the dynamic. Key word here being imposes.
(04-25-2011, 08:38 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: The action is secondary, and the will of love by the self will have a very real effect that immediately impacts the situation and immediately forms the situation into a new situation.
I agree with this part...in general. Yes, our love/acceptance will change the dynamic. But we cannot predict in what way it will be changed. We may still need to take action, to preserve our own polarity. We cannot know exactly how the other self will respond.
(04-25-2011, 08:38 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: I think that is good work for the m/b/s complex, but it is not necessarily polarization.
You don't think forgiveness polarizes? Wow. I consider forgiveness the most potent polarization tool there is!