What would you do as a Logos?

[Bring4th_Austin]

I would like to point out, Unity, that Ra said STS lie to positively oriented channels. Ra explicitly states that when contacting a negatively oriented channel, they do not find it necessary to lie. The supposed channeler of this information is indeed STS.

12.15 If the entity at the base of the complex of beingness is oriented towards service to self, the crusaders, who in this case, do not find it necessary to lie, will simply begin to give the philosophy they are here to give.

that is not something particular to contacting entities in 3d planets through channeling or other means. there is not an exception there.

Actually, it is specifically about channeling. The quote is in specific reference to contacting entities on 3D planets. Maybe I'm not understanding you, but it seems that you are stating the exact opposite of what Ra states.

lying, withholding/distorting of truth, manipulation have been described as properties of negative path.

Again, Ra explicitly states in my referenced quote that this is not true when contacting negatively oriented channels. "...do not find it necessary to lie..."

the first requirement for honesty comes in early 6th density, and this is one of the reasons why service to self entities end up turning back to positive at the start of 6th density - because indigo ray requires a measure of truth.

before that point, blue is missing from the negative model. blue as in communication, honesty.

Within the Helping_Hand session there are explanations for all of this. I'm not going to continue to point out all of these facts, because you could read the manuscript yourself and realize what you are saying could be explained within it.

I'd like to express a third time my neutral stance on the material. It is obvious to me, though, that many here choose to judge it vehemently, with almost religious fervor, without even reading through the entire manuscript. In my opinion, such strong preconceptions are dangerous.