04-17-2011, 06:22 PM
(04-17-2011, 05:39 PM)Icaro Wrote:(04-17-2011, 04:00 PM)unity100 Wrote:(04-17-2011, 02:51 PM)Icaro Wrote: Between octaves only concepts can be communicated.
not as such. if we look at what Ra says, not only this octave's harvest light is provided by entities that are coming from the next octave, but also it is possible to 'wander' in between octaves.
Learn to see the validity in a statement and add to it, rather than telling someone they're wrong.
I know that there are those who wander between octaves, but we are talking about how the octaves themselves communicate. I'm not going to minutely refine all of the LOO in one post.
"Plus, there are those who wander." ..is a great response.
In this way we have a conversation, instead of creating the tone of a debate where everything that someone says is somehow wrong.
things that are fundamental hamper and harm a lot, if they are incorrect.
the proposition was that only concepts could be communicated in between octaves. 'adding to it' with 'plus, there are those who wander in between the octaves', would be unclear, and leave a percentage of those who read and forming and opinion about the matter still thinking that initial proposition was correct, 'but also'.
in this forum, we see a lot of people who had read a lot of things in Ra material a lot of times, but, did not venture to establish evidently declared correlations in between the concepts. this is a habitual behavior in all fields of life.
secondly and more dishonestly, veiledly trying to imply one's wrongness but appearing as if confirming what s/he has said, is dishonest and contrary to blue ray manifestation. 'hey, i am painting a picture as if i am agreeing with you, but see, actually i am telling that you are wrong'.
dishonesty is not a trait of positive, or unpolarized path (on and beyond 6d).