Silly question (Colors, Auras, Poltergeists, Pregnancy)

[fairyfarmgirl]

Aha. Thanks for clarifying.

For some reason the 'archangel' thing is of interest to me right now. By which I mean that in my experience, and to my way of thinking, there aren't any. At least not in the traditional sense. Language fails me much of the time, and I far prefer the direct soul-to-soul contact I have out of body, but as my signature says, we'll have to make do!

In my experience, definitions can be useful to some degree, but on my normal level of being, names and definitions don't exist. They aren't needed. If someone thinks of another, the whole spectrum of thoughts and emotions connected with that other describe them perfectly. As everyone's core energy signatures are distinct and unique, there can't be any confusion. So, no names, no definitions in the sense of language we use here. By 'archangels', you (and others) may mean simply beings identified by such a word, while some will think of 'archangels' in a scriptural sense.

What I've found is that often beings of another dimensional existance will happily be whoever you want them to be. Ie., you 'see an angel' and your mind identifies him as Michael for whatever reason. He'll happily be Michael for you. Or you might decide he must be Jesus, and he'll happily be Jesus for you. To him/her it doesn't matter, and they happily fit in with your reality in order to communicate. One thing this subject brings up in some, almost inevitably, is the fear of deception. In this world, to say you're someone you're not is normally done only for deceitful purposes, and we transfer that fear into other levels of being where it may not apply. So, some assume that any 'being of light' who appears and agrees that he/she is [insert favourite name here] must be doing so for the purpose of deceit, even though their message or instruction is of the highest calibre. I think that's why so many people become confused about channelling, and especially about receiving personal instruction from non-physical beings. (Wow - gone way off topic here!)

I read a very interesting site about this ages ago, called 'Dancing with the dark' if I remember correctly. It was by a guy who became involved with a channelling group, but noticed as time went by that the 'channelled being' put people down in very subtle ways. Some people were given personal channelled messages, and little by little dissention and distrust set into the group. He realised that whoever the channelled being was, he wasn't serving the greater good of those involved, but it took a good deal of careful thought and consideration to spot it. (Even more way off topic!)

Anyway, I realise it's a subjective thing, but what's your take on 'archangels'?

Good Greetings Taha:

I have worked with the Archangels for most of my life. They have always been like a gentle cool breeze or a warm cup of tea--- always gently nudging me toward full human potential when asked to assist. Always coming when called at a time of solace. Always and ever watchful and loving presence there to assist when asked to. Always following the Law of One and The Law of Freewill.

As far as I am concerned ArchAngels and Fairies are true being just as you or I are. And Yes, we are all aspects of the Creator. We are all part of the Source Energy.

The Archangels I work with, appear always as they appear to me and they are always the same being time and time again. So I must respectfully disagree with you that it is just some being playing Archangel.

fairyfarmgirl