Did FBI just admit to roswell ?

[zenmaster]

But it was already released, from the FBI, about 30 years ago along with other 'disclosure' related info.

In what form? Where and how?

The document was among several originally realeased via FIO in the 70's. The same document, scanned as a PDF, has been on the FBI's site for at least the past 7 years: http://waybackmachine.org/20041115000000...part01.pdf [waybackmachine.org]

There is a website called UFO Casebook that has it among hundreds of similar FBI documents:
http://www.ufocasebook.com/fbi.html

This particular document is in this batch: http://www.ufocasebook.com/pdf/ufo8.pdf.

what part of 'it is catching the attention of the masses just now' is eluding you ?

its not the availability that is of importance. its that its being brought to attention of those masses.

Not eluding me, I was answering Monica, not even trying to challenge or drive a point.

Sure. There are actually more interesting documents that are not hearsay, like this one, such as those relating to UFOs on radar, and chases.

they arent for the public. a radar image can be dodged by explanations of anything, a chase can be made appear dubious as anything.

But it's on record as an actual event, not hearsay.

roswell is a known famous incident in which actual saucers and aliens were told to be recovered, but heavily denied and ridiculed by government.

admittance to this event, goes beyond any kind of radar image or chase, since the government is admitting to acquiring flying saucers, and alien bodies.

But it's not. I think we see what we want to see, we create the context we want to promote the outcome we want.

No. In my opinion it's only a record of what someone interviewed someone as saying what happened. So 3rd hand? It's probably not what happened.

it is an official fbi agent, reporting what an official usaf investigator has said. not 'someone' from another 'someone'.

The air-force investigator was not the eyewitness. In the course of his investigations, he happened to have interviewed someone that claimed what was written down.

people have been convicted with less.

That's for sure.

i dont know why are you arguing this hard to make this document appear unimportant. it isnt.

In the long run it is. It's really what emphasis we put on it that makes it important, regardless of the actual facts of the case, after all.