Did FBI just admit to roswell ?

[unity100]

Ok, been chastised for people being offended by my sarcasm, so just ignore it if you don't 'resonate': We have to blame someone for lack of free energy technology, lack info on visitors, and the like. Why not the headless govt? After all, NASA = space = UFO = visitors, and NASA is government, so logically government controls info on visitors. Hey and, just wouldn't it be great to have disruptive information like disclosure creating a paradigm shift in understanding, ushering in a new age or awareness, where we can finally appreciate a broader context for our lives and role in the universal community. (Can you say unconscious personal allegory?) Whenever we ask unconscious questions (such as demanding some ambiguous idea of disclosure), we will eventually find the answers that seem to fit, but it will not be on our terms and may not be the truth.

no we dont 'have to' blame someone. we know who exactly to blame, and what reason, because it was actually told in Ra material :

http://lawofone.info/results.php?session...=1&ss=1#11

8.11 Questioner: Would this type of craft come close to solving many of the energy problems as far as transport goes?

Ra: I am Ra. The technology your peoples possess at this time is capable of resolving each and every limitation which plagues your social memory complex at this present nexus of experience. However, the concerns of some of your beings with distortions towards what you would call powerful energy cause these solutions to be withheld until the solutions are so needed that those with the distortion can then become further distorted in the direction of power.

there are entities that are withholding this from public, in order to use these for personal power purposes. its not something that is dubious or questionable, we are conveyed this information by a reliable informant.

SHE has been involved with ufo research for decades. or others. for the masses, 'ufo researcher' doesnt seem something trustworthy. they are portrayed by the mass media as kooks, crooks, nutjobs. regardless of their respectability within the aware, the reliability of them outside these circles are non.

Due to the nature of the info, what the reporters choose to emphasize as important or relevant, IMO, determines their reliability. Respectability, on the other hand, is earned through integrity and guts to break status quo. In her reports, LMH often refuses to use critical thinking which is a negative in my opinion.
The Texas UFO case comes to mind.

for you maybe. or for anyone who is open minded, or for anyone into spiritualism or ufo subjects, even if a little.

to most of the population, and to hostiles of ufo subjects, respectability and reliability revolve on other things. fbi admitting ufo existence, would be something reliable and acceptable in their regard.

"The Big White Lie" - a great book.

Millions?

and still, american public is unaware of what has happened and gets dumbstruck when readily available documents from the internet are linked to them. millions among a sea of 300 million uninterested people believing otherwise, or having themselves conditioned to believe otherwise by third parties. same as the ufo situation.

How easy do you want it? Before the internet was opened, people interested in UFOs tended to buy books on the subject. It's been mentioned in the books. And it looks like it's actually a big joke too - not disinfo per se, just a joke.

how easy this has been, is exactly how easy it should be. this occurrence is quite good for the level of easiness it should be at.

Contrary to your earlier stated opinion, the US has led the world in releasing so-called UFO 'disclosure' info, offering stacks of info since the 70'/80's. Regardless of people being interested in the info or not.

u.s. has not officially released stacks of information officially as a government. the u.s. ufo files still remain unopened, undisclosed. russia, france, u.k. and a number of other governments, had released their information.