04-10-2011, 04:30 PM
(04-10-2011, 04:00 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: Yes. When you put it like that, zenmaster, I fully agree.Ok, been chastised for people being offended by my sarcasm, so just ignore it if you don't 'resonate': We have to blame someone for lack of free energy technology, lack info on visitors, and the like. Why not the headless govt? After all, NASA = space = UFO = visitors, and NASA is government, so logically government controls info on visitors. Hey and, just wouldn't it be great to have disruptive information like disclosure creating a paradigm shift in understanding, ushering in a new age or awareness, where we can finally appreciate a broader context for our lives and role in the universal community. (Can you say unconscious personal allegory?) Whenever we ask unconscious questions (such as demanding some ambiguous idea of disclosure), we will eventually find the answers that seem to fit, but it will not be on our terms and may not be the truth.
Of course I have my own version of acceptable information that I personally clarify as disclosure.
It's funny to me. Trust the government when it releases what I want to hear, and the recompartmentalize the rest that I don't like as "hidden" and "conspiracy."
It was fun to read this, exciting even. So was my dessert.
Still, we all charge ourselves as the ones to pay attention. So, applause, keep it up. Remember to keep salt on the table though.
(unnecessary information: disclosure, to me, means nothing less than direct, personal contact)
Lacking guidance, we always revert to the convenient appeal to authority and institutions in a desperate attempts understand more about ourselves. It gets played out time and time again through projective mechanisms. Most of the ET contactee experience is of the exact same nature - that is, deeply allegorical.