03-22-2011, 06:44 AM
(02-23-2011, 06:10 AM)Confused Wrote:Quote:This light of love was made to have in its occurrences of being certain characteristics, among them the infinite whole paradoxically described by the straight line, as you would call it. This paradox is responsible for the shape of the various physical illusion entities you call solar systems, galaxies, and planets of revolving and tending towards the lenticular.
Do you have any hypothesis or deductions as to why the 'infinite whole' is 'paradoxically described by the straight line'. I have a growing feeling that Ra used words very precisely, to the maximum level achievable in communication with humans.
The paradox, or statement that contradicts itself, is that the infinite whole cannot be a straight line. Infinite form, be it time or space, is lenticular, or convex like a flying saucer or spinning soap bubble. We tend to call infinity forever forward and back as
if it were a straight line, this can't be, thus it is paradoxically described.
The more pertinent question for me is why did Ra state that a statement that contradicts itself, in this case the statement "infinit whole is a straight line," is responsible for the formation of lenticular shaped illusions.
On the subject of how light travels:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_(waves)