(03-16-2011, 08:47 PM)unity100 Wrote:(03-16-2011, 08:41 PM)Derek Wrote: Zeta talk totally ripped David off. If you go back and read what happened with them this is apparent. Laura knight was doing something similar.
Regardless of how much of it effected you it is obviously clouding your view.
zetatalk website was there with good measure of its material up circa 1997.
http://replay.waybackmachine.org/1996120...atalk.com/
david wilcock speaks of internet being new at 1999.
Quote:I aknowleged it, and posted my view about it at least 3 times if not much more. What is frustrating is that you ignore my response and keep pushing that ONE QUOTE from the Law of One and your PERSONAL OPINION on it.
ra says excessive concentration on specific material, is a sign of depolarization of a channel.
what part of that is 'my' opinion ?
Zeta and the cassiopeians use alot of terminology from the Ra material (and since david is online, probably his material) and distorts it. If you read their material closely you can see that alot of what they write is STS.
Ra says that focusing only on earth changes, doom and gloom etc is a sign of depolarization. David talks about Law of One based spirituality, Ascension, Science, Et phenomenon, Politics/ conspiracy, and many many more. One thing he always does is bring in hope, and keep people's vibration high.
(03-16-2011, 08:56 PM)yossarian Wrote:(03-16-2011, 08:41 PM)Derek Wrote: I aknowleged it, and posted my view about it at least 3 times if not much more. What is frustrating is that you ignore my response and keep pushing that ONE QUOTE from the Law of One and your PERSONAL OPINION on it.
To get equanimity with unity you have to recognize that he doesn't acknowledge conventional social graces.
Basically "manners" and "tact" are not really his interest. If you expect him to respond like a normal person you'll be disappointed everytime.
Also, if you expect him to put a lot of effort into seeing things from your perspective, again, you're barking up the wrong tree.
It's frustrating to talk to him because he so easily misunderstands what you're saying. I used to think it was intellectual dishonesty, now I just think he's exceptionally quirky.
Thank you Yossarian. I needed that grounding.
I don't want to hurt my own polarity by engaging in this.