03-16-2011, 08:09 PM
(03-16-2011, 07:55 PM)Derek Wrote: Alright listen, This is what I hear you saying: "David mentions some things about his personal life [in channelings that are FOR HIMSELF about HIS OWN PERSONAL LIFE] therefore all of his research, all of the science, everything he has ever uncovered, everything he has ever written , everything he has ever said is completely wrong"
Here are some things you may find interesting
This is also how Carla sees it, as shes mentioned it many times. They both believe that his higher self is in Ra and that he was channeling that. They both believe him moving out was the best thing for him.
what incarnated entities think about a particular person, is of little interest to me. i think i had had emphasized that, i am using the purest reliable information at hand, to conclude the nature of other channeled material. not the opinions of incarnated entities about each other.
Quote:No. The Ra that David channels—and we’ve talked this out—is not the same source as the Ra Group, it’s his private guidance. He feels that he is a sixth-density wanderer and that he came from Ra, so naturally his higher self, his guidance, would be Ra, so he’s picking up his own guidance for him.
there is one Ra society complex. they call themselves, 'i am Ra'. not, 'we are Ra'. some 'subset' of Ra society complex, totally acting in lieu of the collective will so emphasized and expressed in the Ra material we work on, can only be justified by david wilcock himself through the rationalizations he provides himself.
there is no 'private guidance subset' of a society complex - we are told that there is a higher self for entities in 3d, and for entities 3d and above, entity's totality, or society complex, or totality of society complex acts as higher self. there has been no 'subsetifications' of either of these communicated in these matters in Ra material. actually, neither in quo channelings.
Quote:.........
derek. i see you getting quite personalized and aggravated in this. its your choice to believe and rely on whatever you wish. you had ignored and dodged any clear pointers to the nature of the information you are accepting. i see it as a personal choice. however, let me tell you one personal thing too :
i have spent/lost ~ 11 years of my life while feeding on compromised material, and it isnt something that anyone would desire. the materials i lost that time on, manifest themselves A LOT in what david wilcock produces, either as himself, or as channeling.