Quote:Posted by unity100 - Today 05:48 PM
(Today 03:53 PM)Derek Wrote: That link you posted would be relevant if he completely sold out and started putting himself off as "the messiah" and making everything he does into a giant business (instead of giving 80% of it away for free). He refers to that point and quote from the Law of One often.
that is the extreme end. had he done it, he would be switched to the other side of the spectrum completely.
it says aggrandizement of self, specific information, reduces polarity there, and compromises the channel. situation fits what is described there.
Quote:That is your opinion. Ra defines it similarly, saying that the way ego is defined by many is a misnomer and it actually is related to the body consciousness (which is exactly how David defines it)
no its not my 'opinion'. i have taken it from Ra's definiton of ego as we know it in our own society. there is nothing in Ra material that links the ego to body consciousness. if so, i would like to see the part that does it.
Quote:Why the need to attack his channeling? What about all the other amazing work that he has brought to the table?
because, we are in a forum that is involved in spiritual teachings ?
Quote:He has awakened SO MANY people.
He is probably the only person in the alternative community providing hope and dispelling fear.
He has discovered so many valuable things that nobody else has.
He has brought so many people to the Law of One.
not to mention that none of these eliminate the ego problem and the accompanying polarity reduction and heightened possibility of compromise, but also it is questionable that what he is 'awakening' people to. he is talking about as much conspiracy material as flat out conspiracy sites like zetatalk.
Quote:What is your comment on that?
It feels good to just sit back and attack someone and project your shadow onto them. Studies have shown that people actually get an opiate rush in their brain when they do this.
Frankly from most of the posts Ive seen that attack David you really don't know what your talking about. You post assumptions that can easily be disproven. Why do you feel the need to nitpick everything he does?
you have disproven none of the post assumptions so far, even if they are easily disproven. and you are rather debasing the people who bring opposing ideas to whatever david wilcock puts out - not disproving their arguments but questioning their motives for raising arguments. and the one doing the defense, is david wilcock - from his mouth. his definition of ego, his good deeds and so on. from his perspective.
we are giving links and quotes to the trusted source material, the very same material which is supposedly channeled by david wilcock. yet, you are dodging to take them into account, by taking them to extreme end and therefore leaving david wilcock in the acceptable threshold.
Quote:He lived with Carla for sometime. Why don't you ask her if he has a big ego? Scott Mandelker (who is good friends with him, and has collaborated with him on many things) doesn't seem to think so.
yes. and despite being reincarnation of edgar cayce, a member of society complex Ra, and someone who is able to channel Ra in a conscious basis, he is not with L/L Research group, who had to quit Ra workings because a team member has left.
why, if david wilcock is such and such a person who is not only edgar cayce reincarnation, but someone easily channeling Ra consciously, not working with l/l group at this time ?
Intellectual dishonesty.
dishonesty in performing intellectual activities like thought or communication. Examples are:
* the advocacy of a position which the advocate knows or believes to be false or misleading
* the advocacy of a position which the advocate does not know to be true, and has not performed rigorous due diligence to ensure the truthfulness of the position
* the conscious omission of aspects of the truth known or believed to be relevant in the particular context.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_dishonesty
Your not focusing on 90% of his material and what he has done for the planet. Your choosing only to focus on the fact that he talks about himself in some of his personal channelings he posted on the internet.
You are using that as total proof that he is an egomaniac
You are denying
That he constantly tells people that he is no better than them. They can have all the abilities he has, and that he shouldn't be put up on a pedestal.
All the good works hes done
The positive things Carla and Scott Mandelker have said about him
Gives away 80% of his material for free
etc
Your focusing on whether he says hes from Ra or not, and that he mentions some personal material in some of his readings.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)