divinecosmos hacked again

[Derek]

Listen, this is the last time I'm going to respond to this. I appreciate your opinion, but I don't want to waste vital energy Smile The vast majority of those channelings are his own personal channelings that he was using for personal guidance. They are coming from his higher self and are about his life. Some of them contain inspiring material and prophecy, so he released them online. There are hundreds more he hasn't. The channelings he has released online for public only say things like this

"Again, our goal is not to promote David or his works. David is one aspect of a much greater collective initiative, and it has many, many facets.

Our goal is to reach the shoreline of your awareness, and set sail with a craft of our own design in collaboration with you – such that there is no need to worry about the future, or concern yourself with the frequency of available materials of any kind, whether they be David’s writings or otherwise."

David constantly stresses that he doesn't want to be put on a pedestal.

again, the endless amount of personal-related stuff in any of the things he channels, means that he has an overindulgence in his own self.

providing and producing reasons for it does not change that fact.

i have given you direct link to Ra quote about aggrandizement of self/organization reducing polarity of the channeler.

The way he defined ego in that post is exactly how Carl Jung and many others define it.

If he didn't have products he would not be on the internet. Nobody would know who he is and far fewer people would know about the Law of One. That is a fact.

Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers.

david's or carl gustav jung's definition of ego, is not relevant to spiritual definition of ego. a good link to the definition of ego related manifestations was, again, given by a link to Ra material.

Davids Higher Self is part of the Ra social/memory/complex as are millions of other wanderers.

Says who?

EDIT: I am not trying to pick a fight here or mean it in any other negative sense, but is genuinely curious about who said that?

david himself of course. the 60 million crowded Ra social memory complex has shown their approach to channeling with the work they undertaken with ll group. and that, isnt at parallels with what this person is doing, or saying.

He uses channeling as a way to receive guidance from his own higher self, much like dream work or tarot readings. Some of them he posts online, so they have some of his personal material within them. Many of the readings he posts online for only the public do not say anything about him at all.

That link you posted would be relevant if he completely sold out and started putting himself off as "the messiah" and making everything he does into a giant business (instead of giving 80% of it away for free). He refers to that point and quote from the Law of One often.

david's or carl gustav jung's definition of ego, is not relevant to spiritual definition of ego. a good link to the definition of ego related manifestations was, again, given by a link to Ra material.

That is your opinion. Ra defines it similarly, saying that the way ego is defined by many is a misnomer and it actually is related to the body consciousness (which is exactly how David defines it)

---

Channelings can be from any density right? If it's Higher Self, it is 6D. But a channel could be 4D and lie about being 6D, right?

His higher self downgraded into 5d in order to be able to fully work with him in an ongoing basis. I believe their is a quote from the Law of One saying that Ra had to do this as well. His higher self has given him thousands of accurate predictions and guidance that has done nothing but help him and others over the years. Some of those predictions he has posted online before they came true. Like 9/11, the economy, bush/gore election and more.

---

Why the need to attack his channeling? What about all the other amazing work that he has brought to the table?

He has done SO MUCH good for people.

He has awakened SO MANY people.

He is probably the only person in the alternative community providing hope and dispelling fear.

He has discovered so many valuable things that nobody else has.

He has brought so many people to the Law of One.



What is your comment on that?
It feels good to just sit back and attack someone and project your shadow onto them. Studies have shown that people actually get an opiate rush in their brain when they do this.

Frankly from most of the posts Ive seen that attack David you really don't know what your talking about. You post assumptions that can easily be disproven. Why do you feel the need to nitpick everything he does?

He lived with Carla for sometime. Why don't you ask her if he has a big ego? Scott Mandelker (who is good friends with him, and has collaborated with him on many things) doesn't seem to think so.