03-16-2011, 08:05 AM
(03-16-2011, 07:47 AM)yossarian Wrote: the whole point is that David is not channeling Ra the Social Memory Complex
He's channeling one individual who happens to be a part of that Social Memory Complex
this is different
There are likely millions of wanderers on the Earth with higher selves from Ra, right? David talks to his higher self with conscious channeling, he doesn't use unconscious channeling to talk to Ra the social memory complex. So of course the material is different. The source is different and the channeller is different.
He doesn't claim to channel the same Ra from The Ra Material. It's a different Ra.
a 6d society complex is something that is greatly harmonized. you cant just break away and act against the collective will of the complex you belong to, and engage in a manner that is contrary to the collective will.
ra was at a point of addressing them as 'i am Ra' - meaning that 60 million souls were acting together, thinking together to that extent. not 'we are Ra' even.
remember that, one of the reasons why wanderers incarnate in 3d planets is that their society complex may decide that the wanderer needs a lesson revisited. so, basically, a society complex has as much effect and clout on a wanderer. this means, it wouldnt be possible for a part of that society complex to go against the collective will of the complex and still remain a part of that complex.
meaning, david wilcock cannot be channeling Ra in any interpretation. i doubt that, at the point of late 6d, any entity would leave their society complex, for david wilcock to be a breakaway entity which left its society complex, and therefore channeling his 'higher self'. also wanderers do not have higher selves. society complex, or, totality of the wanderer or the totality of the society complex, acts as higher self.