Session 46.9 Polarity and anger.

[J.W.]

Like this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPgn2ht_...opTvDotCom

I posted in Olio about hollywood celebrities and it was deleted. Personally from that video I agreed with the comments he was completely reasonable. But the reason for the paparazzi is to make celebrities have to run away from them thus concealing easy visual clues that those celebrities are not "normal", and in my belief, these people aren't part of normal society. When they go through court cases every part of this is false. They do not go to jail like the rest of us. They do not go to school. In all those rags to riches stories why has none of the other people said celebrity was working with in Subway posted pictures of when they were working with the now celebrity? This is quite a deep deception that reaches into many areas of our lives and actively deceives a great deal of people.


So even things like this might be scripted. In relation to the quote though Tobey was not trying to control the paparazzi and make them do his bidding, he was just trying to get them out of the way, so it would not be an example of negatively polarised anger by my perception.

I appreciate your perspective and how you view the world. 

I wonder where your view point begin to shift when viewing celebrities as not "normal" or different than you, as a soul, as an experiencer of reality.

And from that point of "shift," or "alienation," you are able to deem that his reaction is justifiable, when the window of infinite possibility/probability
isn't confined to the choice Tobey made. 

He had a choice to not call them names, force the door aggressively at them, and shows grimace. 

Also the comment section is a confirmation bias, 

It was a very "human" reaction, doesn't mean it was the "only" reaction. 

Simply put, "he made me do it." Instead of... "I yelled at them, I lost my temper."