Main Topic Deleted

[flofrog]

Obviously each one of us entities have a different course. I do think, but, lol,  this is my personal feminine view for this incarnation,  that possibly being monogamous  might be  a simpler work for a woman than a man, and I can feel, lol, many women ready to fight me over that lol lol lol.


Now I was just officiant for a weeding two week ends ago and it was quite extraordinary to participate in that.  I was only one of two officcaitns Thank God, lol.

But I did also say a few words to the young couple whom I have known for long and deeply care for.


So I made fun of both of them first pretending to describe them and in fact saying the absolute opposite of whom they were so everyone would roll in laughter but then I cited a passage from St Exupery from his book Citadel. Citadel is a sort of philosophical meditation of who would be  a desert Bedouin Chief about his people in the desert and how he sees life.  There is, among many others,  a passage on love, and this might talk about monogamous love, but as being projected the end of a long patient path to get there, lol

the beginning reflects a view of love from the feminine entity not being what in fact love is about, for St Exupery , then we get to what his final view is...

so here goes, 

 

From St Exupery :

You met along your life the one who thought of herself as an idol. What was she receiving from love ? Everything, unto your joy to see her again, becomes to her an hommage.
She is enriched, in her greed, of pointless captures, believing her joy will be found in this pile. But she only piles up ashes. For the real use of your gifts was path from one to the other and not capture.

How to build love which is face , read thought the threads, if  there are no threads on which to trace it ?

For there are no  cathedral without ceremonial of the stones.

But this one scorns the exchanges from which she would be born.

She believes that love is a gift she could enclose into herself. If you love her, it means she won you. She jails you inside believing  she enriches herself. But love is no treasure to seize but obligation on either sides. But the fruit of an accepted ceremonial.

Turn away from her.
Tell her :
“ I hastened towards you, with the joy to meet you.
But you were mistaken on my appeal, for you read in it my dependence : I was not dependent, I was generous.”

So it is of the empire, when a soldier owes it his life. It is not claim of the empire, but claim of God. He orders that man has a sense. And, the sense of that man is to be  soldier of the empire.

And so it is with the sentinels who owe me the honors.  I demand them, but retain nothing of them for myself.  Through me, sentinels have obligations. I am the knot of the duty of the sentinels.


And so with love.

But if I meet the one who blushes and who stammers, and who needs presents to learn to smile, for they are to her sea winds and not capture, then I shall make myself path which releases her.

I shall neither humiliate myself nor humiliate her in love. I shall be around her  like space and within her like time.  I shall tell her : ‘. Do not hasten to know me, there is nothing to capture. I am space and time where to become,’

If she needs me like the seed of the soil to make itself tree, I shall not stifle her with my self importance.

I shall neither honor her for herself.  I will scratch her harshly with the talons of love. My love to her will be eagle with powerful wings. And it’s not me she will discover, but through me, the valleys, the mountains, the stars, the gods.

It’s not about me. I am only the one who carries. It’s not about you : you are only path towards the meadows at sunrise.  It’s not about us : we are together passage for God who borrows for an instant our generation and uses it.

Curiously that chapter in Citadelle started by reflections on humility. How humility of the heart demands that you do not humiliate yourslelf, but open yourself to exchange.... Interesting chapter leading from humility to love in third density...