03-03-2022, 02:05 AM
(03-02-2022, 07:00 PM)Vestige Wrote: So, how do we have any negative entities in this galaxy at all? ...What we see, we are. What we are, we see.
I struggle too understanding the left hand path clearly. In this context, I see about me many mirrors. And many 'other selves' looking back at me, reflecting. Those reflections - those other selves - have their own free will as well. And they see what they see about them. There are many of us who gaze, and we each see different things. We each see a unique creation about us, I guess. This unique perception is our perception of the creation.
And then I start wondering all types of paradoxical questions that hurt my brain.
(03-02-2022, 07:00 PM)Vestige Wrote: What we see, we are. And what we are, we see... to return to the metaphor in the mist.
And, the Confederation entities ask us again and again: where is love in this moment?
(03-02-2022, 07:00 PM)Vestige Wrote: This is one of the most intriguing concepts to me--well, if you will excuse the interpretation I am foisting onto your words. This concept of "regularizing" and "retaining" light is, I feel, related to what the Confederation has said about our relationship to the Creator. Again, microcosm-macrocosm... although I have been learning recently just how profound this relationship really is.
I am Q’uo. The Creator created a great original Expression or Thought. This we have called the logos or love. This principle, this love, created all that there is by the quantizing articulation of light. Yet all that is created is of the nature of its parent source, which is love. The reason for offering love, appreciation, a blessing and thanksgiving to the infinite One is that the entity within incarnation is attempting to form its vibratory frequency more and more like that of the vibrational frequency of the one great original Thought, which is love. The closer the seeker comes to matching that vibratory frequency, the more that entity will be perceived as offering praise and thanksgiving. This is true far beneath any articulation of words or even what you consider thoughts. Rather, it is in the nature of the way creation is built. That is, original Thought expresses in love, thanks, blessing, praise and rejoicing. Thusly, it is not a Creator hungry for praise and thanks that requires homage of its worshippers, but rather it is love, it is reflected in love, and in that infinite reflection lies truth.
[https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/1993/0627]
...
The one original Thought upon which all creation was founded and with which all creation redounds is love. Yes, my friends, love is a thought, a principle, a logos. You, by your very consciousnesses, are the Logos in a holographic representation, yet you are completely unlike any other holographic representation of the Creator, for your experiences are unique to your particular consciousness. Your field of energy is completely unique and precious to the one infinite Creator, and your greatest gift is your being, for by your mirroring of your perceptions, the Creator learns of Itself.
[https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/1986/0720]
...
Now, one could easily suppose that were it the case that in one bright, shining day, all were able to return fulsome love back to the Creator, that the Creator would stand fully exposed to itself, and would know itself finally in Its completeness. However, it has been our experience, (and once again we would like to iterate that our experience is limited), that no knowing ever even begins to exhaust the mystery of the Creator, or the mystery of the creation. It is truly an inexhaustible source. And that inexhaustibility is something which you may sense in a small way in your experiences of love for your fellow creatures. For when you love your beloved, when you love your wife, when you love your husband, when you love your children, when you love your friends, when you love your groups, when you love your planet, you do so in such a way that it does not diminish that which is love. In fact, strangely, it seems to augment that which is love, and once again we face a paradox or a mystery, because a mystery which is so infinite and so completely mysterious, which seemed to be something that could not become more itself, that is to say, more mysterious, by being loved, and yet, it seems to us that this is exactly what happens. It seems to us that the creation does become more, and that the concept of infinity very strangely, incomprehensibly, is susceptible of becoming more. And more than that, it is of such a nature intrinsically that the orientation to more is part of its very constitution, part of its make-up.
... when you are able to find in yourself that resonance of love that can reach out to that which does not solicit it, but rather seems on the contrary to reject it, you have inched, however slightly, towards a wholeness of your whole being, towards a realization of your own being as unified, and every such experience of loving the unlovable, every such experience of unifying the un-unified is an experience of the Creator finding Its lost love returning home, returning to its source. And in doing so, you give also the opportunity of that other center of being, that other incarnate individual, an opportunity, perhaps, to experience (once again however slightly), an aspect of itself, himself, herself, not previously accessible. And so love heals many a wound, love bridges many a division. Love offers itself both as a possible activity and as a condition of being which is the very stuff, the very source, the very destiny of the entire Creation.
[https://www.llresearch.org/channeling/2016/0904]
These are intriguing quotes. I'll have to take some time with them. I feel like I could read sessions over and over again, and find a new layer of meaning each time.