Social media may be ‘fundamentally at odds’ with science

[schubert]

"It is debatable whether social media platforms that are designed to monetize outrage and disagreement among users are the most productive channel for convincing skeptical publics that settled science about climate change or vaccines is not up for debate."


"science that cannot be questioned isn't science, it's propaganda."

sounds to me like the people who wrote that article are trying to write off all the debate and people disagreeing with the narrative as mindless "outrage and disagreement". some people have just taken in different information, see things from a different perspective and disagree.