10-27-2021, 10:30 AM
(10-26-2021, 10:43 PM)IndigoSalvia Wrote: Ra's info may be applicable to the rest of us humans: plant-based, and to the extent necessary for the individual MBS complex, the least distorted complex protein. And then if deemed necessary, "fresh and best quality possible" animal proteins.
By its very nature, if/when we consume an animal protein, slaughter of a 2D animal is a given. I know of no way in this 3D illusion to consume animal meat that does not involve killing the animal ... against its will. So it seems to be an infringement upon their free will.
I kill and consume plants (which are 2D beings) for sustenance of my 3D body, etc. While my 3D brain perceives a seeming difference between killing an animal and a plant, is there a difference in terms of Law of One?
Do we, as 3D beings, have any "rights" over lower-density life forms (e.g., disregard their free will) under Law of One? Does the Law of Free Will apply to us 3D beings? Or, when does the L of FW start applying?
Has anyone found any Q'uo information on this topic?
I don't know of any Q'uo quotes on eating animals, but I would imagine anything there would have a greater chance of being influenced by the channeler since it's conscious channeling.
I do not think humans have any rights at all over other beings. I do think there is at least inference in just the simple phrase "all is one." If all is one, how could one entity have dominion over or rights over another entity? Infringing upon the free will of another, according to the LOO material, is the left-hand path (STS).
Regarding another inference, on the right-hand path, STO, being of service to others would include in my opinion doing the least harm to others. It isn't possible to traverse 3D as an organic being and not consume food in order to survive. Since plants have evolved to be consumed in order to propagate, they have no central nervous system, they can still live if their fruit is taken, they can still survive even when cut down, etc., simple logic will deduce that eating plants causes less harm than eating animals.
In addition, Ra speaks of higher density beings consuming light for sustenance. Since plants photosynthesize, they are closer to consuming light than dead animals. So it seems to me eating a plant-based diet is a step forward in evolution.
Quote:43.24 ▶ Questioner: I am simply trying to trace the, you might say, the evolution of this catalyst that then, as you say, changes in fifth density. I might as well complete this and ask if there is any ingestion of food in sixth density?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. However, the nature of this food is that of light and is impossible to describe to you in any meaningful way as regards the thrust of your query.