07-30-2021, 10:32 AM
Why doesn't Ra talk about emptiness or the void? I've got a new idea that removes the need for a void!
I will therefore change my definition to: Reality is the difference between infinity and finity. Darn! It's often embarrassing to have to change previous claims. And it can cause problems related to other claims, especially if the previous claim that needs to be changed is a fundamental one. Fortunately in this case the crucial idea is the web of expanding relations and that remains exactly the same in this case.
Quote:"Questioner: Could you tell me how intelligent infinity became, shall we say (I’m having difficulty with some of the language), how intelligent infinity became individualized from itself?
Ra: I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.
The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned due to freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity there is no ending to many-ness. The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present." - Law of One 13.12
I will therefore change my definition to: Reality is the difference between infinity and finity. Darn! It's often embarrassing to have to change previous claims. And it can cause problems related to other claims, especially if the previous claim that needs to be changed is a fundamental one. Fortunately in this case the crucial idea is the web of expanding relations and that remains exactly the same in this case.