07-19-2021, 09:36 PM
The issue is not hard to understand.
One side wants to control and censor CRITICAL information and open discussion in order to keep things in line with THEIR dogmatic view of what constitutes "positivity", backed by people who want to stick their head in the sand. The other wants the censorship to cease and for there to be transparency and a singular, equal set of standards.
It's a pro-censorship vs. anti-censorship thing.
It is not some sort of misunderstanding.
One side wants to control and censor CRITICAL information and open discussion in order to keep things in line with THEIR dogmatic view of what constitutes "positivity", backed by people who want to stick their head in the sand. The other wants the censorship to cease and for there to be transparency and a singular, equal set of standards.
It's a pro-censorship vs. anti-censorship thing.
It is not some sort of misunderstanding.