Question about thoughts

[meadow-foreigner]

That thought generator just produces that inner dialog. The One and only spirit witnesses this. "You" have your own generator, but what witnesses it is exactly the same One spirit that witnesses "mine". Hence "we" are One.

The way you phrase it, it's as if the origin of thoughts is an artificial creation (i.e. a "generator") when in reality thoughts are creations by themselves.

Maybe it could be called a thought catcher instead of a though generator. "What thought did you take today?" ~Ra  

How that One spirit creates the illusion of a separation in between generators and witnesser (or observed and observer)? I have no idea and that is exactly how it's supposed to be IMHO.

Amusingly enough, there might be more to that question than just rhetorical philosophical reasoning.

Please do elaborate! That sounds interesting.

In an ultimate (and rather abstract sense), all is one. All we experience may be framed as The One Infinite Creator experiencing the full extent of The Creation.

However, do note that you do have your uniqueness and your consciousness. And that there are multiple ways of experiencing this uniqueness, especially in a 3D environment, in regards to your relationship with other-Selves.

Thought communication is, in essence, comparable to verbal communication: there is the emitter and the receiver; with due respect to the fact that both are Selves; that is, you don't communicate with an echo chamber through telepathy, you actually send and receive thoughts in the form of linguistic messages, visual imagery, and so on.

To consider that the thoughts that come by your mind are solely perceived by you is naïve, from my current point of understanding. This is why I inquired you about your take on this seeming artificiality of the thinking process: there is much, much that can be learned from it; though one really needs a mind rid of preconceived notions or prejudice in order to truly benefit from it.

For instance: how would you clearly discern, in a practical sense, thoughts that come from you and thoughts that come to you? How would you deal with thoughts that are contrary to your expectations? How would you handle opposition in the daily affairs, in the sphere of your mind? How would you benefit from this new modus of communication? What would you communicate mentally, and what would you assimilate physically?

The topic is vast and can stem lots of really useful points of view, though it depends on the willingness of people to participate in it.