06-11-2021, 08:12 AM
(06-10-2021, 06:07 PM)ANGEL Wrote: Wow, I've been surprised by all of your answers. Some more than others. Perhaps more accurately I should say your nonanswers to my question.
I admit perhaps I should have been more thorough while I gave examples for service perhaps, but my point was merely that when we love it is a natural honor/duty to take care of those we love. Loving is indeed an action as well as a receiving and both are difficult lessons to learn.
I am going to just think this was my lack of wording coherently my question. However, let's make this clear point first, this question I can assure you has nothing to do with my concept or perceived lack thereof regarding service or my need of choice. It in fact is not anyone of you who in any way know or should judge these concepts in me. I have reread my words and am at loss to understand what is so blazingly obvious to you to see and why it has to do with me instead of answering the question.
My question is simply this.... because Ra is so deliberate in the preciseness of his words, because he doesn't want any of the concepts spoken to be misunderstood in any way...when HE says those in this dimension MUST make a choice, that choice being one of SERVICE to self or others, instead of stating the real choice, which is to Accept Love or not. That is the choice one must make after all. Or is this not as obvious to you as is to myself?? Why state the choice in a service context at all. When the choice to love and love indicates precisely how service pans out. Those without that green Chakra activated as Ra has indicated, you know the one that is the seat of love, they only would serve themselves...naturally.
So I ask you again why service if the choice is love???
You asked for anything you may be missing in your conception of the idea as discussed by Ra. I answered what you asked, feel free to disregard if it doesn't work for you.
I will only add that you are making an assumption, that the "real choice, which is to Accept Love or not" is what Ra was REALLY discussing. You are free to believe whatever you want about the Ra material, but IMO that is not a position supported by the Law of One books. If Ra meant that, they would have said that.