Why doesn't anybody know about the Law of One?

[Sena]

Recently I read "The Ascension Mysteries: Revealing the Cosmic Battle Between Good and Evil" by David Wilcock. Wilcock's writings encouraged me to delve deeper into the Law of One.

Hi, Sena.  I'm curious, what was it you found in the book that inspired you to dig more into the Law of One?  Did it make it more comprehensible or did it make some particular aspect more compelling?  Did the "battle" element resonate with you?

Thanks for answering.  And, oh, if you don't mind my asking, is there any way you feel those of us here who have hung out for years can help you in your seeking?

   

Sacred Fool, thanks for your comment and questions. To answer your second question first, I am finding this forum really useful. I check the new posts every morning, and I invariably find something relevant.
Regarding the Wilcock book, I found his reference to the New Earth interesting. Here is a quote from the book:

Indiana University professor James Albert Harrill wrote a surprisingly detailed piece
linking these Greco-Roman philosophical teachings to later writings in the Christian Bible and
other texts:
Apocalyptic scenarios of eschatological [end-times] destruction and renewal appear in
many early Christian writings. . . . For example, the apostle Paul declares the wrath of the Day of
the Lord (1 Thess 1:10; 4:13–5:10; cf. 2 Thess 2:1–12) and the ultimate transformation of ―all
creation‖ (Rom 8:18–25). The Gospel of Mark promises its audience that heaven and earth ―will
pass away‖ in the imminent end times (13:24–31; cf. Matt 5:18; Luke 16:17; Isa 13:9–13). The
seer of Revelation envisages . . . a ―new heaven and a new earth‖ replacing ―the first heaven and
the first earth,‖ which ―had passed away‖ (21:1)

I had a dream last night in which I thought I might be in the New Earth. This was because in the dream there was a waterfall in a place in which there was no waterfall in the Old Earth.
Wilcock’s recommendation of the Law of One material is unequivocal:

The historical data about our solar system in the Law of One has remarkable, almost
one-to-one correlations with what the insiders tell us. Certain insider details have revealed new
information that Dr. Don Elkins, the questioner in the Law of One series, never thought to ask
about. Although a fair number of accurate contacts have occurred in our recent history, including
the Edgar Cayce readings, no other intuitively derived source even comes close to having this
much verifiable information. I first read the Law of One series in 1996, and every real insider I
met has independently validated dozens of specific details in the books. In almost every single
case, they were completely unaware of the Law of One series or of how their information was
already present within it.