04-26-2021, 07:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-26-2021, 07:10 PM by Steppingfeet.)
(04-26-2021, 03:52 PM)Sacred Fool Wrote: Don't blame me. THEY started it!!!!!
Well, they eat intelligent energy for breakfast. I mean, we do too, but stepped down a few million times until we have a delicious bowl of oat clusters cereal.
(04-26-2021, 03:52 PM)Sacred Fool Wrote: One answer. Yeah, maybe I introduced some unnecessary confusion with "(Love)," for she becomes love in her active form, not while in repose. And yes, "-trix" is a Latinate suffix denoting feminine gender. (Other examples: aviatrix, directrix...) It happens to be a personal preference and, therefore, like totally transient in importance, generally speaking.
Introducing idiosyncratic words understood by one into the definition could illuminate the target word less than intended. I'd suggest at least a clarifier.
So I understand you to mean "Creator," essentially, just with a feminine tilt. While "Creator" is gender-neutral, thanks to the West's Abrahamic past, it is likely seen with a male hue. (I don't know how much gender bias is projected onto ultimate reality in Eastern thought, or elsewhere.)
"Creatrix" is a colorful change, and I like how for me it evokes both the active Creative Principle and the receptive matrix or environment into which Its glory manifests.
Explanation by the tongue makes most things clear, but love unexplained is clearer. - Rumi