Why the word Adonai? Adonai Vasu Boragus

[unity100]

I see that you are concerned with attempting to catch words up in a contradictory logic trap. This is truly a transient activity, although a service of proofreading none-the-less.

that's irrelevant. base principle is a base principle. honesty is honesty everywhere. meaning :

I had expressed that witholding information that could be potentially beneficial to other selves and only using it for your self is STS, this is the 3d context.

Lets say in 7d my statement is meaningless, positive and negative, STO and STS are balanced.

From a 3d perspective a 7d entity makes actions that do not add up or contradict, a single action splits into two streams passing through the distortion of self. The 3d perspective labels a single action as both cruel and loving or some mixture dependent upon bias. Entities such as Guardians are not STO or STS, and all information given by them must balance out in distortion.

for example, dishonesty cannot be something right in '3d context', then suddenly become wrong in 'Xd context'. dishonesty is dishonesty. its nature is the same in all densities or conditions. same goes for everything else.

you cannot justify and unjustify concepts depending in 'context'. they are what they are in all context.

balance does not happen with the nature of concepts changing. it happens with them balancing with their counter-concept. so, withholding information for one's own self use does not become something else in 7d. it becomes balanced with its counterpart. yet, it, and its counterpart, are still there in 7d.

in a 'balanced' action utilizing a balance as such, both parts of the equation become present in the interaction. one is not excluded over another.

With all that said I am merely questioning your intent and bias which seems more distorted towards purity of knowledge than love or balance. Ideal knowledge has very little practical application of this particular 3d planet. If the planet only consisted of you, your wisdom would be perfect. I am suggesting an openness to differing paths to the same unity. Yes they will be contradictory and free will is the commonality.

the above paragraph makes no sense. 'love', 'balance', 'purity of knowledge', 'wisdom' are not complementary or contradictory as a group.

So back to the issue, you think I was calling you STS by inferrence and now you want to catch me in a contradiction. You aren't a guardian, nor am I channeling you, you are in a human body/mind/spirit complex and subject to far more distorted dimensional properties. If you did not have something to learn/teach you would not be here in this place. I admire your perseverence towards purity of knowledge.

you were naming withholding information as isolationist, and self-centered.

i am not trying to catch you in a contradiction. there is a contradiction :

you are justifying withholding of information by higher density entities or entities which have to operate outside the veil as non-isolationist, and inventing '3d perspective' '7d perspective' etc contexts for this. there is no such thing as 'context' in regard to this. positive is positive in 3d, positive is positive in a veiled 3d environment, positive is still positive in 4d after the veil lifts, positive is still positive in 5d. this goes on until octave end. the nature of a certain base principle or mechanic, does not change.

'oh, it is self centered if we do it, but if higher density entities do it, its ok' <- no such thing exists. even if there is balance, there is balance, there is both positive and negative. neither the nature of positive nor the nature of negative changes in a higher density. they are still there, but they are found both in the same interaction, therefore, in balance.

so basically, you cannot just demand information and openness and label the opposite of it as self-serving, negative, or isolationist or undesired and so on, if you are accepting and justifying withholding of information by another source. it becomes double standards. it becomes contradiction.