A question for the advanced

[Indiken]

Something does not connect, shall I say.

One such concept is that the name you use to describe your body does not hold true meaning.
To me everything is a truth, no more, no less. I believe one has to search within oneself to answer why one concept is "truer" than the other. They say the whole universe is inside oneself.

When you close your eyes and become aware of your 'body-vessel', it is done as a sort of mind construct, shall I say, a thought without labels and restrictions of language. How would you speak of this 'concept'? It can be almost impossible as the concept loses its wholeness and becomes distorted the moment it is released into 3D as, as Ra would call it, a sound vibratory complex; it's not the same anymore.
Ra view is distorted. As is mine and Yours. Ra are only humble messengers. I have an idea that people would make a religion out of Ra material. Some maybe even memorized the sentences. That is their way. Again what use this concept of transcendental body has to You, Sir.

The significance of all this is the understanding that rises as one realizes that the apparently surface level physical concepts such as 'the body' do not stop at that superficial layer; only one's thought/mind can stop there. This may all sound very confusing, esoteric, and perhaps even slightly ridiculous depending on one's development in assimilating metaphysical topics. However, the mere conscious act of seeking or trying to look through this aforementioned superficial layer, even without belief, will begin a chain of catalysts that can help reaching even deeper understandings, if only they are desired.
What are these understandings? This a major shortcomming I see in people, they say there is more, but cannot to provide the substance what is more. My understanding is simple. As people say I am a beginner.

It doesn't matter, if you like some naming label or don't;
My distortion/perspective is that it does matter. I stated earlier, if one needs to experience this "3D" more, the connotation of a vehicle instead of a body is less of use.

when you deal with this emotion, or balance it, it likely falls away in a fell swoop of understanding and indifference. Would I call the 6th density body a vehicle? a light thingy? etheric body? or even a body at all? I dunno.. In my minds eye the concept is quite clear but with language.. I tend to call it all sorts of things depending on situation. So, do I even really truly know? Of course not, as understanding is in the end not of this density (3rd), but  what I do know is that it is irrelevant to focus on the naming activity at all. This is my understanding.
Thank You, our perspectives differ.

And Indiken, no matter how many questions you may ask, and you may ask any number, either here or in private messaging, I will answer them with an honest heart and the best of my ability.  

In response I offer You my perspective.

Be well.
AL.