03-23-2021, 05:37 PM
(03-23-2021, 11:47 AM)Ymarsakar Wrote: <B>Technically speaking, if we have an inherent bias toward kindness, it is also counter-productive for polarization.</b>
Why is there an inherent bias toward kindness?
If a person is kind, can hell not be paved with good intentions?
"To really make a choice, you need to be aware to a great extent of the two potentials."
Wouldn't actions speak louder than words and concepts?
"Positive 4D and negative 4D are quite unlike one another and in both cases the potential to experience the other density is somewhat forsaken (at least for a long time). "
In what sense are they unlike or like each other?
What do those densities mean to you?
"If an action is automatic because of an in-built bias, then it is not polarizing"
There was a part in the Ra archives that said some logoi did not allow free will to be present, so the natural default option was STO polarization over a very very long time. They considered this uninteresting or boring to the Creator, as the end result was already known and not very exciting. SOrta like reading a wikipedia spoiler of the plot of a movie.
The Hidden Hand and Era testimonies, also said the Logos of this world, YHVH (the ancient God of Mars/Hebrews), initially started this place without initiating free will. A garden of eden in which people did not know good and evil, is not polarizing yes.
Well, if Yod Heh Vav Heh is the original Logos (which it is) then wouldn't be the the God of all of us? Logos meaning WORD....