02-18-2021, 09:08 PM
(02-18-2021, 06:54 PM)zedro Wrote:(02-18-2021, 02:38 PM)Minyatur Wrote: Well from the material's point of view, if you were perfectly balanced that is correct.
Then again, who is the perfectly balanced entity.
I'm not sure the material even fully advocates that (assuming no action, just observation and love). Because if we are all one, then me stopping the attacker (also me) with the minimum amount of violence required (because the prime me is STO and wants to minimize karma) is perfectly acceptable, because I'm trying to protect the other other me, and the attacker me could have been just seeking that counter catalyst........because it's all me, right?
This is the folly of trying to follow 6d precepts in 3d, because we can just end up spiritually bypassing catalysts instead of experiencing the inherent paradoxes and learning from it. If the answer to every question is just "we are one!", then I don't think we are making the best out of this incarnation here. This 3d experiment to me is a systematic exercise in the discovery of moral juxtapositions. Real lessons are earned, cheat sheets and crib notes are just that. The imbalances are a feature, and not a bug.
Well I don't really think the perfectly balanced entity would do nothing whatsoever within the situation. My comment was more about the emotional response, from which many things can be done.
Quote:42.4 Questioner: Would a perfectly balanced entity feel an emotional response when being attacked by the other-self?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. The response is love.
But like I said, who among us is the perfectly balanced entity? The work is more of distilling the events afterwards.