Why doesn't anybody know about the Law of One?

[jafar]

This is not The Law of One according to how L/L Research understands it. I mean we can at least agree to that, correct? It is channeled material that was voice recorded and then written in a manuscript. Not three people sitting around dicussing on how to execute a book and brainstorming their best personal understandings of this Law. I think we could agree on that, couldn't we? Or perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are saying here.

I'm sorry I don't get what you meant here.
You're mentioning about the technicalities of how the message was being transmitted and recorded??

In the notion of Lao Tse...
When somebody define 'something' then what is not 'something' will also exist as a result of the definition of 'something'.
But both something and not something are always in unity.

And we don't have to agree, as both agreement and it's opposite disagreement co-exist in the same manner.