02-04-2011, 03:13 AM
(02-03-2011, 08:44 PM)Ankh Wrote: This is probably how we become aware of something. Imagine if you lived in the world where the central suns were shining around-the-clock. And materia in that world would be of such a transparency that the light/photons would pierce that without reducing in their intensity. Thus, if you walk into a room without windows and close the door it would be same amount of light there as outside the house. Would you in that world be aware of light?Yes exactly! that reminds me of Osho who once said that darkness does not exist, it is just an absence. The absence of light. Therefore darkness cannot be fought, because how can you fight with an enemy that does not exist? Instead you light a candle and darkness disappears. I guess duality is necessary for us to be able to make a choice. Free will.
(02-03-2011, 08:44 PM)Ankh Wrote: Do you have any good URL on that? I tried to google, but didn't get any clear definitions for that word/concept. Yours is actually most clear, but short. I want to know more!I am sorry, I did not find a link either. I think duality may be prevalent in buddhist doctrine? I could not find the word in Ra, either.
(02-03-2011, 08:44 PM)Ankh Wrote: Yes. And much more. Something big is happening.That is what I get from you, too. Enjoy!
(02-03-2011, 08:44 PM)Ankh Wrote: Is this what you thought of?It could be, yes. Catalyst is not longer needed, this density is no longer needed... the end of duality? Maybe I will get some more insight this weekend. I will let you know.
"42.1 Questioner: I am going to make a statement and ask you to comment on its degree of accuracy. I am assuming that the balanced entity would not be swayed either towards positive or negative emotions by any situation which he might confront. By remaining unemotional in any situation, the balanced entity may clearly discern the appropriate and necessary responses in harmony with the Law of One for each situation. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is an incorrect application of the balancing which we have discussed. The exercise of first experiencing feelings and then consciously discovering their antitheses within the being has as its objective not the smooth flow of feelings both positive and negative while remaining unswayed but rather the objective of becoming unswayed. This is a simpler result and takes much practice, shall we say.
The catalyst of experience works in order for the learn/teachings of this density to occur. However, if there is seen in the being a response, even if it is simply observed, the entity is still using the catalyst for learn/teaching. The end result is that the catalyst is no longer needed. Thus this density is no longer needed. This is not indifference or objectivity but a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. This seeing elicits no response due to catalytic reactions. Thus the entity is now able to become co-Creator of experiential occurrences. This is the truer balance."