02-03-2011, 08:44 PM
(02-03-2011, 08:07 AM)Meerie Wrote: Duality needs an opposite... black and white. Good and bad. Beautiful and ugly.
This is probably how we become aware of something. Imagine if you lived in the world where the central suns were shining around-the-clock. And materia in that world would be of such a transparency that the light/photons would pierce that without reducing in their intensity. Thus, if you walk into a room without windows and close the door it would be same amount of light there as outside the house. Would you in that world be aware of light?
(02-03-2011, 08:07 AM)Meerie Wrote: Transcending duality is getting past these opposites, toward oneness.
Because all is one and one is all, in the end. I think once you reach that stage, you are one step closer to enlightenment. Or Nirwana, or whatever you like to call it?
Do you have any good URL on that? I tried to google, but didn't get any clear definitions for that word/concept. Yours is actually most clear, but short. I want to know more!
(02-03-2011, 08:07 AM)Meerie Wrote: Isn't that what you are experiencing again, right now? like when you were a child, pre-STS mother?
Yes. And much more. Something big is happening.
(02-03-2011, 08:07 AM)Meerie Wrote: hey I just had an epiphany, sort of... could it be Ra means exactly that, when he talks of feeling an emotion and then feeling the opposite emotion? Transcending duality?
And then becoming balanced?
Duality seems to be part of normal 3rd density life. Could it be 4th D is already beyond duality? Just thinking...
Is this what you thought of?
"42.1 Questioner: I am going to make a statement and ask you to comment on its degree of accuracy. I am assuming that the balanced entity would not be swayed either towards positive or negative emotions by any situation which he might confront. By remaining unemotional in any situation, the balanced entity may clearly discern the appropriate and necessary responses in harmony with the Law of One for each situation. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is an incorrect application of the balancing which we have discussed. The exercise of first experiencing feelings and then consciously discovering their antitheses within the being has as its objective not the smooth flow of feelings both positive and negative while remaining unswayed but rather the objective of becoming unswayed. This is a simpler result and takes much practice, shall we say.
The catalyst of experience works in order for the learn/teachings of this density to occur. However, if there is seen in the being a response, even if it is simply observed, the entity is still using the catalyst for learn/teaching. The end result is that the catalyst is no longer needed. Thus this density is no longer needed. This is not indifference or objectivity but a finely tuned compassion and love which sees all things as love. This seeing elicits no response due to catalytic reactions. Thus the entity is now able to become co-Creator of experiential occurrences. This is the truer balance."
Always a pleasure to "talk" to you, sister. Thank you!
Namasté