12-05-2020, 04:22 PM
Other states - especially 'responsible' conservative ones - in US, literally export their homeless to California:
Homeless people are offered a one way ticket to California or jail. Or worse, getting their tents confiscated and being pushed out of the city in the winter. Which means death. That takes care of the 'homeless' problem, from the perspective of such 'small government, small spending' administrations.
We read many cases of such police actions in such states in which homeless are stripped of their belongings in the winter and left to rot outside the city. That this can happen in a developed country, i tell you, is inexplicable from the perspective of someone from another part of the world. Its murder.
So the choice that the homeless have is to either take the ticket - if that is graciously offered - or go to the only place where the police wouldnt go out of their way to kill them - California.
Better SF, the most humane city in US, literally.
Hence SF has a homeless problem. Except, its not SF's homeless problem, its the homeless problem which the 'responsible' states are throwing on the shoulders of others. Because, when you export your homeless, its not your problem anymore now, is it...
SF is literally the municipal Jesus that is suffering for all the sins of the 'responsible' states.
....
The only solution for CA's problems of this kind is either shutting down the borders and not taking in the problems which it is being exported to by other states (which it legally cant), or bear with it.
The despicable hypocrisy that persists in such 'responsible', 'small government', 'business friendly' states is really, really revealing of evil, sociopathic minds: Their administrations/politicians export their problems to California, then endlessly lambast California for their problem which they exported to California. Because, after all, how will their voter base know since they do not pay attention and even if they did, they would not want to disturb their world view with having to take responsibility and spend some some money on the problem now, do they...
Homeless people are offered a one way ticket to California or jail. Or worse, getting their tents confiscated and being pushed out of the city in the winter. Which means death. That takes care of the 'homeless' problem, from the perspective of such 'small government, small spending' administrations.
We read many cases of such police actions in such states in which homeless are stripped of their belongings in the winter and left to rot outside the city. That this can happen in a developed country, i tell you, is inexplicable from the perspective of someone from another part of the world. Its murder.
So the choice that the homeless have is to either take the ticket - if that is graciously offered - or go to the only place where the police wouldnt go out of their way to kill them - California.
Better SF, the most humane city in US, literally.
Hence SF has a homeless problem. Except, its not SF's homeless problem, its the homeless problem which the 'responsible' states are throwing on the shoulders of others. Because, when you export your homeless, its not your problem anymore now, is it...
SF is literally the municipal Jesus that is suffering for all the sins of the 'responsible' states.
....
The only solution for CA's problems of this kind is either shutting down the borders and not taking in the problems which it is being exported to by other states (which it legally cant), or bear with it.
The despicable hypocrisy that persists in such 'responsible', 'small government', 'business friendly' states is really, really revealing of evil, sociopathic minds: Their administrations/politicians export their problems to California, then endlessly lambast California for their problem which they exported to California. Because, after all, how will their voter base know since they do not pay attention and even if they did, they would not want to disturb their world view with having to take responsibility and spend some some money on the problem now, do they...