02-03-2011, 03:01 PM
Good points, Jeremy, and I encourage your work.
I concluded that the nature of the Material has things going for it. First, as said, they determined to publish the information completely, leaving out nothing (especially after putting out Book 5) and making no edit.
Second, it challenges the reader, politely leaving unsaid that only the qualified would consume all of the information. Not that the info is dangerous but, if it got trivialized, it would end up on the same heap as so many other attempts to reveal truth.
Over these decades, the Material found/is finding its important audience. I don't know that we are a critical mass, but probably.
The Law itself is utterly simple. The distortions and implications make up the bulk of the material, and that would go into your work.
Many of us have processed the data and arrived at some personally important conclusions. Most of them, I have no doubt, are valid. A few come out in this forum and get tuned by the B4th social complex.
If your ambition doesn't run out (as mine has more than once), I suggest that you proceed with care. Share the work in progress with a small number of trusted others and put questions here when you want to work out a sticky point. That's just a suggestion; my thinking is that if you widely publish the work in progress you could get an overload of feedback.
I know what you mean about writing. It organizes your thinking and reveals to you any hole or inconsistency. I started a novel that incorporates the Law and distortions, but got stuck years ago because of my pesky ADD.
If you finish what you start, J, it must mean that its time is come.
Lee
I concluded that the nature of the Material has things going for it. First, as said, they determined to publish the information completely, leaving out nothing (especially after putting out Book 5) and making no edit.
Second, it challenges the reader, politely leaving unsaid that only the qualified would consume all of the information. Not that the info is dangerous but, if it got trivialized, it would end up on the same heap as so many other attempts to reveal truth.
Over these decades, the Material found/is finding its important audience. I don't know that we are a critical mass, but probably.
The Law itself is utterly simple. The distortions and implications make up the bulk of the material, and that would go into your work.
Many of us have processed the data and arrived at some personally important conclusions. Most of them, I have no doubt, are valid. A few come out in this forum and get tuned by the B4th social complex.
If your ambition doesn't run out (as mine has more than once), I suggest that you proceed with care. Share the work in progress with a small number of trusted others and put questions here when you want to work out a sticky point. That's just a suggestion; my thinking is that if you widely publish the work in progress you could get an overload of feedback.
I know what you mean about writing. It organizes your thinking and reveals to you any hole or inconsistency. I started a novel that incorporates the Law and distortions, but got stuck years ago because of my pesky ADD.
If you finish what you start, J, it must mean that its time is come.
Lee