Kundalini And Polarity

[Steppingfeet]

The way I read it--for what that may be worth--the 4D critter's relational love not only feels like failure, it does fail the purity test in that circumstance; whereas the 6D (love contoured by wisdom) approach succeeds.

 
It does indeed seem to fail the purity test. As Ra says said:

This, however, being a battle of equals, the Confederation is aware that it cannot, on equal footing, allow itself to be manipulated in order to remain purely positive, for then though pure it would not be of any consequence, having been placed by the so-called powers of darkness under the heel, as you may say.

It is thus that those who deal with this thought-war must be defensive rather than accepting in order to preserve their usefulness in service to others. Thusly, they cannot accept fully what the Orion Confederation wishes to give, that being enslavement. Thusly, some polarity is lost due to this friction and both sides, if you will, must then regroup.

But why this would be so is not entirely clear to my optical apparatus, except to assume that the "defensive" position and the resulting "friction" diminish the heart and limit love.

4D+ entities could accept, as Ra says, and extend their necks for the collar, but then they'd be entirely depolarized, so what would be the point?

It's just that I don't grok why full acceptance of the negative entity = full acceptance of the negative entity's service: enslavement.

Your and Louisabell's contention seems to be that it is a function of the 4D perspective on what it means to "accept," whereas the 6D perspective layers wisdom into acceptance and thus permits acceptance with an accompanying "no thanks amigo," <cue defensive laser cannon>. Do I understand that correctly?

In my view, Ra was recommending that the 3D creatures employ the 6D approach, therefore there would be no loss of polarity.  Naturally, it would be relatively easy for "the little group" to act this way since it was not enjoying a purposely contentious relationship with other, the way the 4D warrior would be.

Yeah, that's what i was circling around in a previous post: That the 3D+ relationship with the 5D- entity was not a battlefield or a contest. The group took protective measures, and rejected the service, but wasn't otherwise face to face, so to speak, with an enemy combatant locked in a struggle of wills.

On the question, why does a 4D+ entity lose polarity when not accepting the desired service of a 4D- entity (i.e. enslavement)?

I imagine it is because the rules of 4D polarisation must depend on learning how Love can serve. Love in 4D is constant and effortless, as entities there vibrate with the Law of Love - it is putting Love to serviceable use that a 4D entity must learn, as it seeks the Law of Light.

Continuing on, the 4D+ entity wants to serve every other entity it meets. And perhaps the 4D+ entity would want to serve the 4D- entity even more so, due to feeling pity for it. The 4D- entity would of course not be so convinced, so no matter what service the 4D+ entity attempts, it is rendered ineffective. Therefore the 4D+ entity loses polarisation due to a loss of faith in its capacity to serve others.

This seems to be in the same ballpark as Peregrine's thought regarding how the 4D's perception of its intended service effects the consequent advance/regress of its polarity.

I suppose that its overall vibration may be reduced by a "loss of faith in its capacity to serve others." That is, it becomes powered down somewhat in seeing that it has not loved/served the other-self fully, particularly evident when the other self is charging the positive being with a thought grenade. (That sends a message!)

But the "how" love can serve part that you note... 4D lessons are dependent upon other selves.

I still get tripped up on the love "transforming" the negative beings. You have any thoughts there?