11-09-2020, 03:16 AM
Quote:But if the soul is in an higher density, and we become our soul after death, then why would the soul need to be tested for entry into 4D?
Tested? I'm sorry I'm lost here..
However I do understand that this might be an influence from 'judeo-christianity-islam' belief system (which I'm also very familiar) where every 'soul' will be 'tested' and 'judged' in order to 'quality' ( or disqualify).
Quote:Taking that one step further, then am I not my soul right now, both as it's in 6D and as it is traveling from 3D to 4D? Why do I not readily perceive this? Could it be that I am simply confused about my identity? Or is it a bit more complex than that?
According to Ra, the Law of One is:
all things are one,
that there is no polarity,
no right or wrong,
no disharmony,
but only identity.
May I know who or what do you mean by the identification statement of "I" in this case? Is it 'peregrine' the webforum avatar? or the consciousness behind the avatar, who might potentially experienced many other avatars as well?
Because my understanding on this is:
Soul is a 'scoped or bordered unit of consciousness identification'.
Identification of consciousness can happened in many layer and can happened in hierarchical manner.
Novelist, screen writer and actor experienced this regularly in their life.
When a novelist writing a conversation between two characters, let's say A and B, he or she identify itself as A and then came up with words to say by A and then identify itself as B and then came up with words to say by B.
The only difference of this metaphor is: there's no memory isolation being involved. The novelist can still recall that he / she is the 'identity of the novelist' and also A and B, the character in the novel.
But actually is it not that A is also B and also the identity of the novelist? Three of them are the same, three of them are in unity.
Now imagine the novelist came up with a character in the novel let's named him Joe which is also a novelist. In this case the identification happened in multiple layer. In the novel, Joe the novelist authored another novel where in the novel he came up with character named Bertha and Kim.
Then is it not Kim is Bertha is also Joe and is also the novelist?
And of course Kim and Bertha can also authored their own novel, and the identification moves down further.
The going down the line of identification, from the novelist to Joe to Bertha or Kim is named as 'the fall', the 'descent' and I think Ra named this as 'distortion'. The moving up the line of identification from Kim to Joe to the Novelist is called the 'ascension'. Some people also uses term of "Soul Fractioning / Fragmenting" for the 'descent' and "Soul Unification" for the 'ascension'.
Back to the metaphor, now let's introduce memory access isolation on each 'character'. Let's start with Kim, Kim will think that he is only Kim as this is the area of data / memory that he has access to. But when he finally have access to the memory / information as known by Joe, he will realize that I am Kim and also Bertha and also Joe!
And then Joe 'ascended' one level up to the novelist, he will realize that I am not only Joe, I'm also the novelist who has authored many other novels and came up with hundreds if not thousands of many other characters. I am all of those thousand of characters! And so it can furtherly move up further...
So ascension happened not through 'gaining' but through 'shedding'.
Shedding the 'border' of consciousness that separate one with the other and gain data / information that other unit of consciousness has gathered, thus automatically makes you identify yourself as that unit of consciousness as well, as that 'soul' as well.
That's what I understand when Ra (or Quo or others) mentioned "social memory complex'. A collective consciousness who shared data / memory gathered by many identities, many avatars, many unit of consciousness. Thus each identify itself as the entire complex and the complex also identify itself as each.