[blockquote]If there were any truth in your assertion, then the 5D- minus entity that wished to take out Carla could have simply used your little hack instead of having to be crafty, particularly when it was most frustrated.[/blockquote]
It's a kind of trojan, but it was covered here or in another thread, in which a person talked about the translation issue. Information gets distorted in translation, so they can merely nudge the info in such a way that it gets misinterpreted.
For example, when Iamraw told Don Elkins, was it, that the US had UFOs, reverse engineered FLEETS of these things, Don Elkins could not believe it and in fact actively stated that in response. You can look up the reference, yourself, peregrine if you think the newbies here aren't doing the work sufficient for your standards here.
How is it Don Elkins had a resistance to this belief that the United States government already had UFO fleets or that human governments had these fleets? Because Elkins did not know what Corey Goode, David Wilcock, and Michael Salla's sources such as Thompkins or other US military personnel, have whistle blown on.
Thus information can be controlled, hacked, or trojaned from two or more sources. When Don hears the information, he is programmed to disbelieve it because his intellectual ego thinks he knows and this information violates all of his paradigms and triggers him. And information is controlled from the 3rd/4th density realm, via the public consciousness, or classified secrecy acts.
I've seen no support for this in Confederation material and you offer no supporting evidence.
That contradicts yourself, peregrine. You said the Confederation has no knowledge of Satan. Now you say the Confederation material, and you provide no supporting evidence, sources, or quotes, does not support a subject that you think they have no knowledge of.
You also do not address the confusion you have or are spreading here, that when switching the term "Orion" around to Satan, somehow changes the meaning. No, it means about the same as before. Satan means opposition or prosecutor.
You seem to believe that the model you have built for yourself could be somehow factual and so would automatically apply to others. Well the model I built for myself from the Ra Material says that; there is simply no such thing in 3D space/time.
It's not a model I built for myself. As I may have mentioned here or elsewhere, it is direct channeling. Meaning, the same method the group of 3 did to channel iamraw's collective, is being done in current modern day by individual channelers linking to their higher self or other densities/realms. If it is impossible to channel high density information, then you have also directly negated or rejected the Law of One material this forum is based around.
It would appear that you might be introducing fearful information for the fun of it, which happens to be against forum guidelines, by the way.
Is it also against forum guidelines to be a gatekeeper and belittle/make fun of newcomers to the board, as you have done peregrine for fun or some other motivation?
Let us examine the logic of your statement. It would appear someone is introducing fearful information by talking about the existence or non existence of certain negative entities. Then is Carla and Don introducing fearful information as "Orion" is a pretty big topic? As for your idea that it is "for the fun of it", that is another way to mask a personal attack. Meaning, you are not using the Law of One material to debate or criticize/counter the points made here. Rather, you are using your personal authority to say that you have the authority to state something is true or not, because you think you know something. That is yet to be determined.
When you want to say you know something about Confederation sources, and then make no references to any such Confederation source, you really don't see that you are failing your own standard of testing?
Do you really not see this? Also, I don't see you claim to have an empathic or other psychic abilities, so on what basis are you making the claim here that it is for fun? That seems more like a personal bias you have towards someone ,rather than a disagreement about the material in question.
Thank you for mentioning that flofrog. I wasn't aware of the meta thread.
It's a kind of trojan, but it was covered here or in another thread, in which a person talked about the translation issue. Information gets distorted in translation, so they can merely nudge the info in such a way that it gets misinterpreted.
For example, when Iamraw told Don Elkins, was it, that the US had UFOs, reverse engineered FLEETS of these things, Don Elkins could not believe it and in fact actively stated that in response. You can look up the reference, yourself, peregrine if you think the newbies here aren't doing the work sufficient for your standards here.
How is it Don Elkins had a resistance to this belief that the United States government already had UFO fleets or that human governments had these fleets? Because Elkins did not know what Corey Goode, David Wilcock, and Michael Salla's sources such as Thompkins or other US military personnel, have whistle blown on.
Thus information can be controlled, hacked, or trojaned from two or more sources. When Don hears the information, he is programmed to disbelieve it because his intellectual ego thinks he knows and this information violates all of his paradigms and triggers him. And information is controlled from the 3rd/4th density realm, via the public consciousness, or classified secrecy acts.
I've seen no support for this in Confederation material and you offer no supporting evidence.
That contradicts yourself, peregrine. You said the Confederation has no knowledge of Satan. Now you say the Confederation material, and you provide no supporting evidence, sources, or quotes, does not support a subject that you think they have no knowledge of.
You also do not address the confusion you have or are spreading here, that when switching the term "Orion" around to Satan, somehow changes the meaning. No, it means about the same as before. Satan means opposition or prosecutor.
You seem to believe that the model you have built for yourself could be somehow factual and so would automatically apply to others. Well the model I built for myself from the Ra Material says that; there is simply no such thing in 3D space/time.
It's not a model I built for myself. As I may have mentioned here or elsewhere, it is direct channeling. Meaning, the same method the group of 3 did to channel iamraw's collective, is being done in current modern day by individual channelers linking to their higher self or other densities/realms. If it is impossible to channel high density information, then you have also directly negated or rejected the Law of One material this forum is based around.
It would appear that you might be introducing fearful information for the fun of it, which happens to be against forum guidelines, by the way.
Is it also against forum guidelines to be a gatekeeper and belittle/make fun of newcomers to the board, as you have done peregrine for fun or some other motivation?
Let us examine the logic of your statement. It would appear someone is introducing fearful information by talking about the existence or non existence of certain negative entities. Then is Carla and Don introducing fearful information as "Orion" is a pretty big topic? As for your idea that it is "for the fun of it", that is another way to mask a personal attack. Meaning, you are not using the Law of One material to debate or criticize/counter the points made here. Rather, you are using your personal authority to say that you have the authority to state something is true or not, because you think you know something. That is yet to be determined.
When you want to say you know something about Confederation sources, and then make no references to any such Confederation source, you really don't see that you are failing your own standard of testing?
Do you really not see this? Also, I don't see you claim to have an empathic or other psychic abilities, so on what basis are you making the claim here that it is for fun? That seems more like a personal bias you have towards someone ,rather than a disagreement about the material in question.
(09-15-2020, 04:17 PM)flofrog Wrote: Totally Agree on those guidelines by the way
Fact is I was not so much shocked by apparent hateful language, to go back on (sorry for digress) peregrine’s thread about the forums, but I find the roundabout ways to raise fear much more insidious to the group discussion...
Thank you for mentioning that flofrog. I wasn't aware of the meta thread.