(BTW, I've only been acting this way since the moderators seemed to have all fallen asleep.)
Most seekers and those on the adept path, are busy with their astrological pre incarnative, aka pre mortal life planning, events and stuff in 2020. Some are slow, others are fast, and some have finished/graduated.
Judging by the LL LAO podcasts, the research group is progressing in their seeking whatever they are seeking, but moderating a forum of adults, is not high on the priority list. That or there's a frequency/density shift and barrier.
Thanks for the tip.
It probably feels unfriendly to some.
So, to be more direct: In recent years there has been surge, it has seemed to me, of members who don't stay around all that long, but use these spaces to declare that they have the inside scoop on the deep secrets of the universe. Typically, they don't say, "It looks to me like..." or "As I see it...." Rather, they express themselves as if they are gifted oracles when they show no basis for this assumption.
To explain this to non empaths, it is not that it is unfriendly or friendly. Rather, to you, you have processed all your experiences and reactions to those events in sequence. But when you output and project your conclusion in another reaction, they receive most or all of the negative feedback and emotions you felt dealing with all those other "members".
In 4th density telempathic civilizations, they have to keep strict control of certain internal emotions and reactions, because it is too easy to violate etiquette otherwise. To human 3rd density civilizations, driving into someone's home is a boundary problem and conflict. To tele empathic groups, manifesting an action/reaction based on your negative experience, means everybody else will get that negative experience of yours, except this time it is bundled up all in one shot.
This is in addition to other things such as the intent or idea that other member's behavior applies to someone that is not one of those other members. It's what people argue endlessly online about "I didn't write that". This doesn't apply to most online written communication, because the bandwidth of text is very limited and specific. So unless you imply or state that someone said x or y, they can't take offense that someone thought they said something they did not. However, if you are emoting emotions across a 4th density/ heart chakra channel, then that's like a voice or body language "tell". You say one thing, but your voice or body language says the opposite. This is compounded by many empaths not having a very good or disciplined control of their abilities and senses.
As for gifted oracles, channels exist. Unless you have some kind of "ability" to discern that, by what basis are they supposed to justify stuff that does not exist in 3rd density? You are on a forum, talking about an imaginary entity or alien called iamraw (by sound frequency naming). Verifying channeled information has been a thorny subject for quite some time now, since like the beginning. The same applies for people's claims of psychic abilities, or any other ability such as military experience.
Most seekers and those on the adept path, are busy with their astrological pre incarnative, aka pre mortal life planning, events and stuff in 2020. Some are slow, others are fast, and some have finished/graduated.
Judging by the LL LAO podcasts, the research group is progressing in their seeking whatever they are seeking, but moderating a forum of adults, is not high on the priority list. That or there's a frequency/density shift and barrier.
Thanks for the tip.
It probably feels unfriendly to some.
So, to be more direct: In recent years there has been surge, it has seemed to me, of members who don't stay around all that long, but use these spaces to declare that they have the inside scoop on the deep secrets of the universe. Typically, they don't say, "It looks to me like..." or "As I see it...." Rather, they express themselves as if they are gifted oracles when they show no basis for this assumption.
To explain this to non empaths, it is not that it is unfriendly or friendly. Rather, to you, you have processed all your experiences and reactions to those events in sequence. But when you output and project your conclusion in another reaction, they receive most or all of the negative feedback and emotions you felt dealing with all those other "members".
In 4th density telempathic civilizations, they have to keep strict control of certain internal emotions and reactions, because it is too easy to violate etiquette otherwise. To human 3rd density civilizations, driving into someone's home is a boundary problem and conflict. To tele empathic groups, manifesting an action/reaction based on your negative experience, means everybody else will get that negative experience of yours, except this time it is bundled up all in one shot.
This is in addition to other things such as the intent or idea that other member's behavior applies to someone that is not one of those other members. It's what people argue endlessly online about "I didn't write that". This doesn't apply to most online written communication, because the bandwidth of text is very limited and specific. So unless you imply or state that someone said x or y, they can't take offense that someone thought they said something they did not. However, if you are emoting emotions across a 4th density/ heart chakra channel, then that's like a voice or body language "tell". You say one thing, but your voice or body language says the opposite. This is compounded by many empaths not having a very good or disciplined control of their abilities and senses.
As for gifted oracles, channels exist. Unless you have some kind of "ability" to discern that, by what basis are they supposed to justify stuff that does not exist in 3rd density? You are on a forum, talking about an imaginary entity or alien called iamraw (by sound frequency naming). Verifying channeled information has been a thorny subject for quite some time now, since like the beginning. The same applies for people's claims of psychic abilities, or any other ability such as military experience.