08-09-2020, 01:06 PM
Certainly, the single most important element is the evolution of consciousness for humans, as exemplified by the destruction of Atlantis, where technology and consciousness were out of synch.
Sadly, this is true for most people. At a certain point, or maybe it's just me, this changes, and witnessing suffering isn't more or less painful whether it's people or a forest with animals and tress and other life forms. People being more concerned with people is a natural, "tribal" feeling, which I think is a carry-over from 2nd density and the need to survive depended upon herd integrity.
There is a novel from the 80s which I love called 2150, in which the future society keeps the "unevolved" people on a protected island where they can only harm each other and not the environment, societies, or other life. They are free to leave whenever they want. Part of the plot involves bringing a person forward to that society from the "past."
That book spawned a group called the Macro Society.
After the UN made its statement that survival depends on going to a plant-based diet for the planet, it wouldn't be surprising that if we keep going in the direction of destroying the natural resources on this planet laws would be put into place as a last-ditch effort.
Going to a plant-based diet for the world would solve world hunger (as far as what we can produce to eat) and eliminate the largest source of greenhouse gases, aside from the idea that animals are not being used and abused.
Kosher processes are not humane, by the way. But I get your point. There must be a transitional period, wherein respect for life other than human and the health of the planet are taken into consideration, while human society adjusts. It might be taken into consideration, though, that there is much hunger and ill health in the world as it is now. I think it would be worse for those who are in power and those who are fairly well off comparatively who don't want to give up their preferences and addictions.
A note about world hunger: while it's true we could feed the world by stopping animal agriculture and cultivating plant-based crops, there is still the problem, as you have pointed out, of the profit-driven, predatory industries which must be addressed.
Also, strobe lights, such as in an infested attic space, or lighting in general. There are humane traps such as Havahart. And there are companies now that come to your property and do all the work—shore up entrance point; remove the animals (including rattlesnakes) and relocate them.
I couldn't agree more.
And therein lies one of the obstacles. It's not just our corrupt politicians who make it into high-tranking governing offices, it's also the brainwashed and anesthetized public addicted to the media.
What was the result of talking to Metatron?
(08-08-2020, 05:57 PM)Navaratna Wrote: Is the rainforest or the quality of life of people in a Brazilian slum more valuable? It's like a trick question. I think people have more empathy for the environment because it doesn't commit "sin" like people do. Yet at the same time I think most people would rather watch a tree burn than a person burn.
Sadly, this is true for most people. At a certain point, or maybe it's just me, this changes, and witnessing suffering isn't more or less painful whether it's people or a forest with animals and tress and other life forms. People being more concerned with people is a natural, "tribal" feeling, which I think is a carry-over from 2nd density and the need to survive depended upon herd integrity.
(08-08-2020, 08:59 PM)Black Dragon Wrote: Mostly, it's the economic system that keeps us from making any real progress in the area of resource management. It's having sociopaths in control of our governments and corporations. We first have to learn how to detect then and get rid of them, perhaps with brain scans or just with people knowing what traits to look for. I'm not necessarily saying execute them, but marginalize them. Somebody who is provenly incapable of empathy should not be able to live or work in such a way as to have any impact/influence on or power over any aspect of the lives of other people or of animals in any way. This is step one in actually being able to fix things. They should be registered like a sex offender. I've heard of highly advanced 3d planet that's tweaked it's magnetic field to block all STS sociopaths from even being able to incarnate into their population. That would be a good endgame to consider.
There is a novel from the 80s which I love called 2150, in which the future society keeps the "unevolved" people on a protected island where they can only harm each other and not the environment, societies, or other life. They are free to leave whenever they want. Part of the plot involves bringing a person forward to that society from the "past."
That book spawned a group called the Macro Society.
(08-08-2020, 08:59 PM)Black Dragon Wrote: Once those people are removed from power/marginalized, we can start a process that will take a while and be bumpy. With the current system, there is profit in production itself, never mind if the products are lost in transit or spoil on shelves unused, which at least 40% of solids and 80% of milk do. Change this factor, and move away from profit being made simply on entropy. Eliminate over production and large industrialization, and have everything(that can) made fresh and local, and delivered fast and efficient. There won't be any getting everyone to instantly stop eating meat, and you won't be able to strong arm people into it by law, so that process begins with outlawing things that are expressly cruel and industrialized, and allowing only more humane systems like Kosher farms and similar things to exist until they fade out of popularity and use altogether naturally.
After the UN made its statement that survival depends on going to a plant-based diet for the planet, it wouldn't be surprising that if we keep going in the direction of destroying the natural resources on this planet laws would be put into place as a last-ditch effort.
Going to a plant-based diet for the world would solve world hunger (as far as what we can produce to eat) and eliminate the largest source of greenhouse gases, aside from the idea that animals are not being used and abused.
Kosher processes are not humane, by the way. But I get your point. There must be a transitional period, wherein respect for life other than human and the health of the planet are taken into consideration, while human society adjusts. It might be taken into consideration, though, that there is much hunger and ill health in the world as it is now. I think it would be worse for those who are in power and those who are fairly well off comparatively who don't want to give up their preferences and addictions.
A note about world hunger: while it's true we could feed the world by stopping animal agriculture and cultivating plant-based crops, there is still the problem, as you have pointed out, of the profit-driven, predatory industries which must be addressed.
(08-08-2020, 08:59 PM)Black Dragon Wrote: There are frequencies that can be emitted by devices that are harmless but annoying/off putting to pest animals.
Also, strobe lights, such as in an infested attic space, or lighting in general. There are humane traps such as Havahart. And there are companies now that come to your property and do all the work—shore up entrance point; remove the animals (including rattlesnakes) and relocate them.
(08-08-2020, 08:59 PM)Black Dragon Wrote: Other things are obvious-it's long past time we got off of fossil fuels and petroleum based products and found better ways of recycling and dealing with waste. Large scale cultivation of hemp would make biodegradable plastics, fabrics, paper, and much more without petroleum or cutting down trees. Gasses from decomposing garbage and sewage can be used to power generators and create electricity if landfills and sewers were run optimally and filled only with biodegradable things. We should have some sort of zero point energy, but even without that, there's tons of more basic ways just with current tech to produce electricity and fuels.
I couldn't agree more.
(08-08-2020, 08:59 PM)Black Dragon Wrote: I've thought about a lot of these things. There's a lot of answers that are quite logical and simple and don't even require any quantum "Tesla tech", but all of them seem like "fairy tails" or impossible to implement without overturning the current system, and if one has accepted being ruled by sociopaths as an immutable "given"(the term "learned helplessness" comes to mind).
And therein lies one of the obstacles. It's not just our corrupt politicians who make it into high-tranking governing offices, it's also the brainwashed and anesthetized public addicted to the media.
(08-08-2020, 05:06 PM)Great Central Sun Wrote: When I had a problem with junebugs I asked Metatron to help take care of them and keep them out.
You can also talk to the Diva of a certain insect species.
What was the result of talking to Metatron?