I still would like a response to what someone thinks of adopting a person to live in your house for free. I mean if you're going to say that having a job is selfish because you took it from someone, if you're accepting a lower level job to benefit someone else--even though you let someone have the higher rank/business--lets say even with having the lower-paying job you still afford your own place..well hey what if you're not using that place you live in to benefit someone else? if its only for you then :O! Service to self!
If you don't adopt someone even though you could then you're not a completely ideal service-to-others person, right? Those people that you're getting over on, or let have the CEO position of the company/leading ahead of you in business won't generally do it either unless they're in a relationship with the person they invite to live in their home with whether they're male or female.
This is assuming someone lives on their own so that's it's not an infringement on whoever you have to share your property with.
This tells me these things aren't as clear cut as they seem. There are different levels and many different situations determining how self-servicing other other-servicing everyone is.
If you don't adopt someone even though you could then you're not a completely ideal service-to-others person, right? Those people that you're getting over on, or let have the CEO position of the company/leading ahead of you in business won't generally do it either unless they're in a relationship with the person they invite to live in their home with whether they're male or female.
This is assuming someone lives on their own so that's it's not an infringement on whoever you have to share your property with.
This tells me these things aren't as clear cut as they seem. There are different levels and many different situations determining how self-servicing other other-servicing everyone is.