New video by Lawofone author clears up any confusion aboutwhat densities are: chakras

[Asolsutsesvyl]

I addressed this part of your post in my thread and did not get a response. We may have ended the 25,000 year cycle in 2012, entering 8th density.

https://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthre...?tid=18240

"To move past 7D would mean to move past a complete unity of/with this creation to a new or different creation. Ra's description of that is that until that happens, knowledge of what it means is missing. All attempts to fill in the blanks result in using things we know or can at least imagine to describe things we can neither know nor even imagine - not even at the 6D level."

The reason I did not respond is that it seemed like a repetition of what is logically guaranteed to be nonsense. I.e., I interpreted it as you simply not taking the previous feedback seriously and instead just repeating your old line of thinking.

In down-to-Earth terms, an 8th density "new or different creation" is not the same thing as the year on the calendar changing and still being here.

In relation to this creation, 8D is completely timeless, since complete unity is timeless. However, 8D may insofar as it is linked to 7D and 7D to 6D, play a mysterious role in energy flowing in connection with unity. Mysterious here means something also mysterious to 6D.

Logically, it is impossible for Earth after 2012 to be more 8D than Earth before 2012. Any movement in the range of densities between 3D and 4D is unrelated to degree of 8D-ness. But it is possible that 8D may play some role in flow of energy in relation to graduation. Something which lacks the form and limitations of the current creation reaching back through the 7D melding-point, including working with 6D in some way not fully understandable below 7D.

the 25,000 year cycle [approximate time for precession of the equinoxes length] described in these readings is related to 8th density
https://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=18245

The 25 000 year cycle and the related harvest-times, on the one hand, and the logos completion, on the other hand, are two different types of cycles. Like the time when you claimed the Ra material talked about 9D (and it doesn't), here I think you have misread or misremembered something. The additional quotes you included would only make the case if the two types of cycle were the same.

I think this is proof that there are people already beyond the scope of what Law of One communicates. It is acknowledged and the life of Edgar Cayce is an example of a person who was in 8th density.

In your terms, which are different at least in part from those of the Law of One, that may be so. In terms of the Law of One, being a person is logically incompatible with being more/less 8D than any other person, as already pointed out.

In terms of the Law of One, your understanding, if it were to turn out real and valid, also shows that you yourself is above 6D in terms logically irreconcilable with the structure of ideas in the Law of One.

Maybe you simply need different definitions, so your numbers will fit them? You can potentially do that, or alternatively find suitable concepts elsewhere. What I don't really get is why you try to bend the Law of One concepts into a logically impossible shape, instead of finding or defining something which really works for you?