How to develop outside the will of dictatorship?

[Ray711]

I just wanted to say that any movement of the system is a compromise or dictatorship, when many voices fall silent and everyone goes the same way

It's a way of looking at it, but I disagree with this perspective.

I'd like to use the analogy of the individual mind/body/spirit complex again, which can always be extrapolated to any societal groups or collective consciousness. Certain meditation teachings work with the concept of directing (rather than forcing) the attention towards the object of meditation. A beginner meditator is going to find that parts of their mind and body resist the notion of meditating. They will create conflict within the self. Many of these sub-parts of the self will continue for a very long time. In a very literal way, parts of the self want to meditate, whereas other parts of the self refuse to meditate. Hence the distractions, the mind wandering, the unpleasant body sensations, and sometimes even the appearance of involuntary body movements. The process is based on the notion that, by getting in touch with one's divine essence and beingness, these different parts of the self end up being "convinced" of the pleasantness and value of meditation, until eventually the entirety of the self becomes single-pointed, and meditation becomes blissful and effortless. It's never about forcing these "rebellious" parts of the self to meditate, as that will only lead to more violence from their part (if we suppress an avenue for them to express their dislike, they will simply find another). It's about allowing them to find, on their own, the value of that which we want to do, until they willingly start wishing to cooperate.

To connect this with another point you made, you're very much correct in that there is an enormous diversity of factors and voices (both internal and external) that direct our actions, and that the control we have over them is rather questionable. The undisciplined entity is certainly a slave to these factors. It hasn't begun to explore its free will yet. However, if you believe the stories of yogis spending years without ingesting food nor water, it becomes clear that we have enormous potential, and that we are not mere slaves to factors outside of our control. The basic choice of polarity that we are here to make in 3rd density is a very real one, and that's only the beginning towards exploring the infinite potential that, according to the Ra material, resides within us. As we've all read, it takes millions of years to fully manifest that potential, though, and in the mean time, more or less, we have to work with limitations, that's for sure.

Only from the imperfection of people, the one who enslaves and the one who allows himself to be enslaved, are they one, two parts of the same imperfection, and therefore suffer on equal terms.

Is there a need for any system of governance whatsoever in a world where such "imperfections" don't exist in people, though? I would argue that there isn't. Any and all systems of governance exist for the sole purpose of protecting and controlling. The former won't come without a certain degree of the latter. This is the key difference between governments and my previous meditation analogy. Governments don't offer us a way of being that we can follow by example, they don't allow people to follow them (or not) on their own free will. They impose certain rules and conducts upon us, and they exert force upon us when we don't comply. This is a key difference between the negative and the positive polarities. The positive polarity offers its love and acceptance; it is patient and will be there offering what it has to offer, accepting any free will choices by the other entity, even if it's a rejection of the values of love. The negative polarity imposes itself, it calls itself to conquest, and will force the other entity to do what is considered to be the best way of doing things, all under the justification that it's "for their own good".

RA well understands the principle of dialectics, when the answer to the question forms the direction of movement / development of the respondent, so that he would ask the next question in the right direction.

Very true.