(05-13-2020, 04:01 PM)Aion Wrote: Have you ever played around with reducing these numbers to their 'occult' forms?
64 = 10 = 1
49 = 13 = 4
81 = 9
No, not sure how you derived that?
I tried putting in the sequence to Google. results: nothing. Notice how only a tiny fragment is even easy to illustrate.
[4x4=16=4th density green ray, Ra in Lawofone is Venus, diamonds in navaratna, and corresponding planet in navaratna venus]------------------------------------[49 ROYGBIV light octave--pyramid design-49 days in religions-52-Cycle of venus, pyramid angles, in years/64 DNA-hexagrams-coding formulas-lunar days-67-lunaryears-81-[ruby is planet sun, #9 in navaratna] ruby l.a.s.e.r. technology, 81st octave, sunlight, symbol of allah, Ra as sun]
1447912161925283639495264678184100103121124144147169172196199
1D.4Y/4D.7/9D.12Y/16D.19Y/25D.28Y/36D.39Y/49D.52Y/64D.67Y/81D.84Y/100D.103Y/121D.124Y/144D.147Y/169D.172Y/196D.199Y
I thought it was intriguing that 4th density [4x4=16x4=64[8th density]^^^^]
This is why I want peoples opinions. A lot of people interested in mathematics would have a close minded opinion about this though.
I didn't know about planetary squares until you showed that.