Glow the thing is I do just fine on my own.
I'm just describing the attitude of most young men from what I have witnessed in cities and what they want, and how a lot of their actions and attitudes are shaped by doing what is necessary to satisfy the younger women..the ones that live in the cities that the guys are usually interested in.
Yes I realize 30 years ago isn't what your working age was but I meant that in referring to what the minimum wage was. Working full time meant you at least could have a place to live even if you'd have to share it. Now in places like Seattle a person can work full time and be homeless.
None of these issues really concern me I am just expressing the opinion that a girl in a modern city isn't going to be friends with a guy that doesn't have money MOST of the time. Finding a girl in a city and trying to get her to go with you to hicktown rural Missouri to save money cuz you are a broke adult male unable to afford a decent life for the most part..is practically never eveer going to happen in wealthy cities.
In my opinion we have a backwards attitude that punishing people for committing directly harmful acts results in someone being sent to a facility where they will be given a place to live and a potentially lifetime supply of food for free. The for-profit penitentiary.
While ordinary homeless people who did nothing wrong except run out of money will get billions of dollars in aid directed to organizations centered around feeding and clothing/helping the homeless but...they will never be given a place to live for free LOL. NO! WE CAN'T DO THAT!! The guy 2 blocks away needs to pay 850$ to share a small 1 bedroom with another person! UNFAIR. We only give places for people to live for free [or more like at taxpayer cost] if they committed a murder or smoked too much weed.
The times in the U.S. people tried to give the poor a place to live for FREE instead of as a PUNISHMENT, they were called Public Housing Projects "tha projects" and quickly thugs turned them in to complete slums with a very openly and dangerously aggressive attitude towards a civil life and order. Section 8 discount housing still has this problem.
This is why money divides and conquers people, it's built this way for a reason. The rich want the "uneducated" or "poor" people kept away from them and say what you want about "they're people how could you say that about poor people" but do you feel safer walking through a rich neighborhood or some third world slum?
None of this really concerns me but it is all so backwards it is such complete nonsense how people will try to defend what our society does with poor people. Abandons them. Even if they got jobs they wouldn't save.
I do just fine where I am. I am not complaining about the way anything is for me.
I'm just describing the attitude of most young men from what I have witnessed in cities and what they want, and how a lot of their actions and attitudes are shaped by doing what is necessary to satisfy the younger women..the ones that live in the cities that the guys are usually interested in.
Yes I realize 30 years ago isn't what your working age was but I meant that in referring to what the minimum wage was. Working full time meant you at least could have a place to live even if you'd have to share it. Now in places like Seattle a person can work full time and be homeless.
None of these issues really concern me I am just expressing the opinion that a girl in a modern city isn't going to be friends with a guy that doesn't have money MOST of the time. Finding a girl in a city and trying to get her to go with you to hicktown rural Missouri to save money cuz you are a broke adult male unable to afford a decent life for the most part..is practically never eveer going to happen in wealthy cities.
In my opinion we have a backwards attitude that punishing people for committing directly harmful acts results in someone being sent to a facility where they will be given a place to live and a potentially lifetime supply of food for free. The for-profit penitentiary.
While ordinary homeless people who did nothing wrong except run out of money will get billions of dollars in aid directed to organizations centered around feeding and clothing/helping the homeless but...they will never be given a place to live for free LOL. NO! WE CAN'T DO THAT!! The guy 2 blocks away needs to pay 850$ to share a small 1 bedroom with another person! UNFAIR. We only give places for people to live for free [or more like at taxpayer cost] if they committed a murder or smoked too much weed.
The times in the U.S. people tried to give the poor a place to live for FREE instead of as a PUNISHMENT, they were called Public Housing Projects "tha projects" and quickly thugs turned them in to complete slums with a very openly and dangerously aggressive attitude towards a civil life and order. Section 8 discount housing still has this problem.
This is why money divides and conquers people, it's built this way for a reason. The rich want the "uneducated" or "poor" people kept away from them and say what you want about "they're people how could you say that about poor people" but do you feel safer walking through a rich neighborhood or some third world slum?
None of this really concerns me but it is all so backwards it is such complete nonsense how people will try to defend what our society does with poor people. Abandons them. Even if they got jobs they wouldn't save.
I do just fine where I am. I am not complaining about the way anything is for me.