Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Animal or non-animal based diet?

    Thread: Animal or non-animal based diet?


    Navaratna (Offline)

    Dragon of Samadhi
    Posts: 681
    Threads: 52
    Joined: Apr 2020
    #44
    05-05-2020, 09:39 AM (This post was last modified: 05-05-2020, 09:48 AM by Navaratna.)
    (05-05-2020, 09:13 AM)Agua Wrote:
    (05-05-2020, 06:40 AM)Navaratna Wrote:
    (05-05-2020, 05:52 AM)Agua Wrote:
    (05-04-2020, 09:24 PM)sillypumpkins Wrote: my understanding is that even these sources have their distortions, which might explain the discrepancies

    I wouldnt see it that way.

    If its from a channeling, the most obvious source of distortion is the channeler itself.
    Especially in a non- trance channeling, all information has to come through the consciousness of the channeler. So its limited by the limitations of the channeler.

    The second source of distortion are we ourselves.
    We tend to believe we understand what we read.
    Just take the Ra material for example and see if you can find an interpretation of a given statement and see if you find more than two people here who can agree on the same interpretation Wink

    So, everybody might read the same letters, but everybody reads a different text actually.

    I think you are correct, I think I've run in to this problem trying to get opinions from people. People instantly assume that understanding the higher densities couldn't possibly be important to their experience when it actually is what programs it.

    I have some difficulty understanding what you mean here, actually with most of what you wrote.

    So, are you saying its important to understand higher densities to evolve?

    Because I wouldnt agree the slightest bit. I think its a bit delusional to believe we could or even would understand higher densities.
    I would even say the vast majority of us (if not all) do not even understand 3d. It is the work of 3d to „understand“ 3d. Once we do do, we are ready for harvest I would say.
    Understanding higher densities is the work of those densities.

    I believe a very basic lesson in 3d is to get to a point where con can clearly discern between the illusion one would understand something conceptionally as opposed to actually understanding it.

    One of my favourite Ra quotes is: „It is of crucial importance for the entity to accept that it does not understand in order to become harvestable“ (not quoted literally)

    But maybe I misread you, could you clarify?

    favorite parts of the readings is here
    It clearly indicates the green ray corresponds to your heart and is one of the only times Ra instructs a person to use an object to transform themselves.
    __

    57.7 Questioner: Should the crystal be held in the right hand of the healer?

    Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. There are two recommended configurations.
    The first, the chain about the neck to place the crystal in the physical position of the green-ray energy center. Second, the chain hung from the right hand, out-stretched, wound about the hand in such a way that the crystal may be swung so as to effect sensitive adjustments.
    We offer this information realizing that much practice is needed to efficiently use these energies of self. However, each has the capability of doing so, and this information is not information which, if followed accurately, can be deleterious.

    __
    I think this is another good example.
    __
    62.29 Questioner: Yes.

    Ra: You must see the Earth, as you call it, as being seven Earths. There is red, orange, yellow, and there will soon be a completed green color vibratory locus for fourth-density entities which they will call Earth. During the fourth-density experience, due to the lack of development of fourth-density entities, the third-density planetary sphere is not useful for habitation since the early fourth-density entity will not know precisely how to maintain the illusion that fourth density cannot be seen or determined from any instrumentation available to any third density.
    Thus in fourth density the red, orange, and green energy nexi of your planet will be activated while the yellow is in potentiation along with the blue and the indigo.
    May we ask at this time if there be any brief queries?
    __

    This is the chakra system. The chakra system is identified as the Mooladahara [1st density, red ray] which physically 'roots' you to Earth. The higher colors along the ROYGBIV spectrum are described as being activated/transformed as time goes on. Your heart [love, infinitely beating heart of the creator] is centered in the middle of the 7 colors.

    The point of all kundalini is to energize and balances the energy clusters.

    This song kind of reminds me how the Indigo ray...corresponding to the third eye became a thing back in the 70s and 80s where people were developing this idea the new generation was more intuitive. Whether or not it's real I just remember reading about it over time. Of course we're constantly evolving our intuition just look at the number of communication systems that have been made in the past 50 years. that's just a part of how our minds are transforming to keep up with all the stimuli we receive. This book is accurate but old, based on mind said to be many times older.

    Sometimes there is confusion in older spiritual texts if there are 6 or 7 chakras. An explanation I read is that there were 6 before 1970 and this event opened the 7th. Who really knows, it depends on the individual. Maybe some people could only understand 6, while others 7, and some even 14 because there are said to be that many in Sahaja Yoga.

    this youtube link depicts the opening of #7 for everyone on Earth. I think it is true, it is my opinion. It ties in to what Law of One is saying. They mention it in the process of taking shape. Here we are many years later. In my opinion saying you are not in 4th density is saying you have no heart. saying you have no 5th is saying you have no throat, 6 means no mind. 7 becomes difficult as it is not a part of the body. It is a source of energy flowing in to your head. 8 is the influence of the moon, at this point Ra material ends. Sahaja Yoga continues to 14 densities 9 is sun..the text in my previous posts here present the reasoning.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpNYZAAQ0fM




      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    Messages In This Thread
    Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Sunclarity - 05-04-2020, 01:27 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-04-2020, 01:48 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Diana - 05-04-2020, 02:01 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-04-2020, 02:34 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-04-2020, 01:59 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Sunclarity - 05-04-2020, 09:03 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 05:38 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Asolsutsesvyl - 05-04-2020, 03:18 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-04-2020, 03:56 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Diana - 05-04-2020, 04:03 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-04-2020, 04:26 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Diana - 05-04-2020, 04:30 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Infinite - 05-04-2020, 04:05 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 04:28 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Asolsutsesvyl - 05-04-2020, 04:56 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 05:01 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Infinite - 05-04-2020, 05:08 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 06:21 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 05:06 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 06:43 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-04-2020, 07:18 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 06:56 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 06:56 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Sunclarity - 05-04-2020, 09:15 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 09:29 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 07:34 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 07:47 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 08:03 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 08:31 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 09:03 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Sunclarity - 05-04-2020, 09:18 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-04-2020, 09:27 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Louisabell - 05-04-2020, 09:51 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Asolsutsesvyl - 05-05-2020, 01:41 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by ada - 05-04-2020, 08:14 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Sunclarity - 05-04-2020, 09:23 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 05:47 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-04-2020, 09:24 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 05:52 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 06:40 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 09:13 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 09:39 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-05-2020, 10:31 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Alexis - 05-05-2020, 05:43 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Jeremy - 05-05-2020, 05:51 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 07:00 AM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Asolsutsesvyl - 05-05-2020, 02:10 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Agua - 05-05-2020, 12:16 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 01:01 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Diana - 05-05-2020, 12:44 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-05-2020, 12:58 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 06:17 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Asolsutsesvyl - 05-05-2020, 07:27 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Navaratna - 05-05-2020, 07:38 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by Asolsutsesvyl - 05-05-2020, 08:57 PM
    RE: Animal or non-animal based diet? - by sillypumpkins - 05-06-2020, 07:26 PM

    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode