Hardest catalyst to understand

[ilovekittiesbro]

I disagree in that I think that suffering of 2D accelerates them towards 3D.
At least when the animal chooses to give its life.
I think that when a deer dies to feed a native american hunter, that can be a positive spiritual
benefit to the animal.

I don't believe it's positive for the 3D to hurt a 2D, so I can't say for sure.

I seriously doubt a deer would want to give its life to a hunter, Native American or not. That is the point, to me. No animal "wants" to die, as they are driven by an instinct for survival. A human might give his or her life for others, but it doesn't seem likely in the case of 2D animals. They have a strong instinct for survival, and, a nervous system that registers pain.

Because humanity wants (not needs) to consume animals at this point, why cause this suffering? Why wouldn't it be just okay for our 2D animal brothers and sisters to advance through love, not pain, suffering, and the death resulting from that? I sincerely doubt a cow would choose to live out its life in a factory farm. I have many deer friends, who have come to my property. Some of them, I can tell, have advanced awareness possibly from interaction with 3D entities. Would it be better that they advanced instead because a bow hunter shot them, they died suffering and in pain? Would a prayer over the deer make this into a transition of love? Certainly, it has more respect and reverence for life when indigenous peoples hunted this way. But it is no longer necessary in today's world to eat animals. So why not let them be, and let them find love not painful death.

It's written in the Law of One that we need to eat animals. As above so below. We are of course glorified chimps.

Your response doesn't seem to consider that the hunter and the hunted are one and the same. Also, yes there are many many trillions of creatures who have agreed to eat and be eaten. Earth and its creatures and their designs and functions being a constant refinement of choices by the logos.

Combine these concepts and there is a game to play that is much deeper than the virtues that you are clumsily projecting.

Incarnation is a choice that you've forgotten that you've made, this applies to your woodland creatures as well. This choice always ends in death. Death is frequently painful, animals need to eat each other. The correct response to this always is love. Also these experiences are partially pre-programmed, not to mention a total illusion.

Regarding eating animals: I just say thank you before I eat them.