01-21-2011, 02:34 PM
(01-21-2011, 02:06 PM)jeremy6d Wrote: I'd appreciate it if you could expand on your reasoning here. It might help understand your perspective better. Your position here is just about as opposite to mine as I could imagine!
regardless of how us, and the logoi in this creation may attempt to make it more understandable and organized, it seems that the ways and means of spirit, the thing which everything is based on, seems mysterious indeed.
ra says it is there even at 1d, the entity becomes aware of it at end of 2d. it is very probable that it was there long before 1d, and it was there in the earlier octave, and it was there for each and every entity, even when the first thought was being conceptualized. the entire existence and manifestation seems to be the discovery and manifestation of it.
it cant be surpassed, it cant be tricked, it can only be delayed. it is the driving force behind everything, and it will go where it wants to go.
in that respect, it is much better to evaluate things from the perspective of spirit, before anything else. taking an information head on, and letting one's own spirit do whatever it wants to do with it, would be the better course of action.
because, it wont matter this or that way, if one's spirit doesnt want the information/encounter/whatever. doesnt matter how useful and enlightening the information is, doesnt matter how rare the encounter is. if it doesnt want it, it doesnt want it.
anything lacking the driving force of spirit behind it, will not even be half arsed.
Quote:I couldn't agree more. Which is why this would not be a rewriting of the material itself; the original sessions would obviously be the important core material to investigate. Ideally I'm thinking of something to be to the sessions what the Talmud is to the Torah.
why dont you just go ahead and provide your perspective and take on it, while stating it directly and clearly ? it is certain that there are people who would be seeing it through your perspective, and would make use of that perspective.
instead of trying to conform it to this, or that, why dont you let what you see flow freely ?